On Monday 06 Oct 2003 21:20, Dolf Starreveld wrote: > I suppose I was confused then. Am I correct and understanding that > there is no relationship between <id> and the other two > <groupId>/<artifactId>?
Well from how I understand it ... * A project currently uses <groupId> and <id>. It doesn't use <artifactId> at all - it isn't in the POM schema. * A dependency currently uses <artifactId>, <groupId> (<id>, <groupId> is deprecated for dependencies). ... but I can understand why you were confused because the 2 parts (project and dependency) don't *seem* totally consistent. Obviously the <id>, <groupId> for the project will be used in putting any artifacts from the project in the repository - using the same naming scheme as used for the dependencies with those tags. -- Andy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
