I agree with this. In the mid-term, we should end up with identical blocks for the different parts:
<project> <build> <sourceDirectory/> <resources/> <dependencies/> </build> <unitTest> <sourceDirectory/> <resources/> <dependencies/> <!-- must somehow inherit from build too --> </unitTest> <unitTest type="integration"> ... </unitTest> </project> Something to consider for a new model version. - Brett > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 1:12 PM > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: Dependency issues for junit tests > > > "Cary Coulter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/01/2004 > 11:29:38 AM: > > > Wouldn't it just be better to add the > <dependencies>...</dependencies> > to > > the <unitTest> block rather than adding some type of property > > <type>test</type>" to the regular <dependencies>...</dependencies> > area?? > > That makes lots of sense. > -- > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
