Yes, I know; that would not be a limitation for me, therefore is not something I would spend time on. But if you feel we should have it, maybe it is a piece you can take care of. How does it sound to you?
BTW, as you will see the current implementation is straightforward. On a different topic, wrt implementation, I was thinking of using the standard maven directory src/main/scripts as root for the directory scanner, so that we do not really have to specify a base directory and we can use includes and excludes to evaluate a subset of the files. What do you think? If this is ok for you, do you know which directory scanner shall we use? Ste On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Siegfried Goeschl <siegfried.goes...@it20one.at> wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > in that case you would tie the latest incarnation of the > script-maven-plugin to the JDK 1.6 ... :-) > > Siegfried Goeschl > > PS : I have a look at the plugin tonight > > Stefano Fornari wrote: >> Siegfried, >> that would be great. I guess the first question I would answer is if >> we need tu update BSF support. My vote is to use the previous version >> of the script plugin when JSR223 is not available. >> >> The changes I would like to do for now is to being able to specify >> more files to be evaluated. >> >> Ste --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
