Same here .... :-) Stefano Fornari wrote: > Hi Tomek, > I think I'll have a first version by tonight. How would you like to > proceed? Shall I pack the source code and post it to the list? Or do > you prefer a patch (but keep in mind there will be a lot of changes). > > Please let me know. > Ste > > On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Tomasz Pik <tom...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Fornari >> <stefano.forn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> I needed a plugin to run JavaScript scripts and I ran into >>> script-maven-plugin. It looks that id does most of what I need, but I >>> would need to extend it anyway to allow the evaluation of more than >>> one script. Looking at the documentation and code, I noticed, it seems >>> a bit outdated and supports BSF 2.x only. >>> In the JDK 1.6, JSR223 is implemented and provides already the Rhino >>> JavaScript engine implementation. I was therefore wondering if it >>> makes sense at all to develop a script-maven-plugin 2.0 that supports >>> JSR223 and drops support for BSF (who wants to use BSF engines can >>> keep using 1.0-SNAPSHOT). I would develop such version and contribute >>> it to the project if Tomasz is fine with it. The alternative is to >>> develop a separate plugin, but it would be a pity to fragment this >>> simple mojo. >>> >> Yes, go for it. >> Initially, I've been developing this plugin with groovy in mind >> and then whole GMaven thing comes... >> Also, with JDK1.6 being a de facto standard on developer's environments, >> I think it would be better to use JSR233 instead of BSF. >> >> Regards, >> Tomek >> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Stefano >>> >>> -- >>> Ste >>> >>> > > > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
