I'm beginning to see this now. I was asked to look at a number of products that we may use on a large ATG/jsp project we'll be working on. Hudson, CruiseControl, Maven and Ant. I don't any of us knows much about them, but I have to sort out the differences in each. I think I'm leaning towards a pairing of Hudson/Maven pairing, but it's still early.
Thx for the reply. On Apr 7, 2010, at 12:06 PM, Adam Purkiss wrote: > > They are two different products that work well together rather then competing > products. Why are you testing them? > > > > Hudson put simply is a CI server that you provide Maven/Ant/Shell scripts etc > to and it does builds and you can generate reports about, Maven is a project > comprehension tool that can be used as a way to build software, manage > dependancies and also run other tools on code. > > > > My descriptions are basic at best but I think you are trying to compare two > things that I would be using together and not instead of so maybe a better > understanding of what your objective is would help answer the question. > >> From: lore...@thethurmans.com >> Subject: Maven and Hudson >> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 11:59:05 -0500 >> To: users@maven.apache.org >> >> I hope this question is suitable for the list, if not apologies. >> >> Can someone give me a comparison between Maven and Hudson? I'm in the >> process of testing both of these, but would like some opinions on the >> strengths/weaknesses of the product. >> Thanks >> >> "My Break-Dancing days are over, but there's always the Funky Chicken" >> --The Full Monty >> >> Lorenzo Thurman >> lore...@thethurmans.com >> >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > Got a phone? Get Hotmail & Messenger for mobile! > http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9724464 "Beware of all enterprises that require new clothes." -- Henry David Thoreau Lorenzo Thurman lore...@thethurmans.com
