Hi, Thanks for the reply.
The whole team is not using SVN to version the code. My case, I'm using git. So every time I run the install goal that builds the whole project, it fails since I have an SVN repository in the SCM tag. So, what I want is to run the build number process manually or at least in another goal rather than install... the site goal doesn't fit too. Any ideas? -- Rui On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Baptiste MATHUS <m...@batmat.net> wrote: > Hi, > Imo, running this goal from the command line is nonsense. This will create > a > property that's designed to be typically used inside other parts of the > pom. > What are you trying to do? > > BTW, if you run this goal from CLI, why don't you just add the next goal to > be run on the same command line? > Le 24 févr. 2011 16:23, "Rui Vilão" <rpvi...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I'm using the buildnumber plugin and I want to execute a given antrun > goal > > ONLY when I explicitly call that plugin from the console. > > > > So, imagine that I execute mvn buildnumber:create and in the pom I do > > something like: > > > > <plugin> > > <artifactId>maven-antrun-plugin</artifactId> > > <executions> > > <phase>WHAT DO I PUT HERE?!</phase> > > <execution> > > <goals> > > <goal>run</goal> > > </goals> > > <configuration> > > <tasks> > > <echo message="${version}.${buildNumber}" file="build" > > append="false"/> > > </tasks> > > </configuration> > > </execution> > > </executions> > > </plugin> > > > > So I don't want to run this in a common life cycle. Install doesn't work > for > > me and the immediately after that one is deploy, that doesn't work > either. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Rui >