The number one reason I've had this problem in the past is forgetting to
specify:
<type>ejb</type>
in the dependency declarations for EJB jars.
On 04/03/2012, at 2:33 AM, Markus KARG wrote:
> Maven 3.0.4 is producing application.xml containing <module> entries for
> some dependencies (RAR modules), but which is missing <module> entries for
> other dependencies (EJB modules). This is weird as the pom more or less is
> empty. It just contains the dependencies (RAR modules and EJB modules) and
> Java EE version (6). So I assume one cannot do wrong. Is that a bug in Maven
> or what the heck is the trick to get <module> entries for EJB modules?
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
