It is assume that automated processes triggered by maven build scripts need to 
be 
1)told what to do and 
2)the same build scripts need to be told what specific steps need to be 
executed and in which order in order to accomplish each task

if an automated processes in danger of going fubar becomes a 'statistical 
probability' ..it is up to us (hopefully) intelligent humans to 
1)note the aberrant behavior (violation of multiple rules)
2)pull smartly on the choke collar (i.e. shortcircuit the task behavior and 
quiesce the process)

if the automated process does not respond <appropriately> in a <preconfigured> 
amount of time..the off switch should be considered..
to wit:

Cause:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/markets/2013/07/02/headwinds-loom-for-stocks-in-second-half/2484555/
 
Effect:
http://money.cnn.com/2000/03/30/markets/markets_newyork/
 
Because these scenarios have become a reality one of the mission statements of 
CTOs of Financial Houses is to  monitor all financial transactions by 
monitoring software on 24/7/365  basis... the rule-based engine of the 
monitoring software will
1) monitor aberrant behavior by applying violations of transactions to 
preconfigured 'rules' and 
2) apply appropriate shortcircuits when <n> number of preconfigured rules have 
been violated

(speaking of shortcirtcuit we should probably continue this discussion offline)
Martin 
______________________________________________ 
Jogi és Bizalmassági kinyilatkoztatás/Verzicht und 
Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité

 Ez az
üzenet bizalmas.  Ha nem ön az akinek szánva volt, akkor kérjük, hogy
jelentse azt nekünk vissza. Semmiféle továbbítása vagy másolatának
készítése nem megengedett.  Ez az üzenet csak ismeret cserét szolgál és
semmiféle jogi alkalmazhatósága sincs.  Mivel az electronikus üzenetek
könnyen megváltoztathatóak, ezért minket semmi felelöség nem terhelhet
ezen üzenet tartalma miatt.

Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger 
sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung 
oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem 
Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. 
Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung 
fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le 
destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez 
l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est 
interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe 
quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement 
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité 
pour le contenu fourni.

 
> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:01:33 -0600
> From: vektor.kni...@gmail.com
> To: users@maven.apache.org
> Subject: re: agency theory and software development
> 
> Given the future of computation and being in a technological 
> singularity, how do we divert a total disaster when the 'machines' have 
> solid bodies? Since Hume, we have had theories about "ghosts in the 
> machine", and if we look even at the beginnings of AI since MIT, it's 
> clear that the software often has a mind of its own and takes us on 
> courses we never intended to go on.
> 
> Finite-state automata, with no solution to the Halting problem, actually 
> have exhibited free will and agency. In that respect, how do we 
> reclassify our notions of human and animal rights when such a species 
> actually has the entire compendium of human history, knowledge and the 
> universe? Think Data from Star Trek.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
> 
                                          

Reply via email to