does it upload the pom with its version fully translated? Thanks
-D On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Benson > > > > Sounds promissing > > > > does it support jenkins env BUILD_NUM? > > I doubt it. I dislike Jenkins and avoid having anything to do with it. > Feel free to make a PR. > > > does it push the actual version to maven repo at install/deploy time? > > if you run mvn deploy, your artifacts will be deployed. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -Dan > > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> https://github.com/basis-technology-corp/auto-version-maven-extension > >> > >> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Jeff Jensen > >> <jeffjen...@upstairstechnology.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Jason van Zyl also mentioned he was working on CD solution for Maven > >> last > >> >> year, not sure what the progress on this front. > >> > > >> > > >> > Yes, I've been curious about the progress too. It's very needed and > so > >> > promising. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Thanks Stephen. > >> >> > >> >> I was excited for a short moment but hitting the reality where I may > >> have > >> >> to deal with hundreds of dev and qa over the confusion of the hidden > >> >> version. Especially, when they have to rebuild a subset of the > product. > >> It > >> >> just not working > >> >> > >> >> Jason van Zyl also mentioned he was working on CD solution for Maven > >> last > >> >> year, not sure what the progress on this front. > >> >> > >> >> -Dan > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Stephen Connolly < > >> >> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > I share your concern. We could fix the concern if we created the > >> >> > transformed pom on disk so that things like GPG signatures were > >> generated > >> >> > correctly, but AIUI the issue there was that the pom could not be > put > >> in > >> >> > target as that would break relative paths. > >> >> > > >> >> > I suspect this is also related to the issue of dependency reduced > poms > >> >> for > >> >> > shade... or any feature where the pom to be used downstream in the > >> >> reactor > >> >> > needs to differ from the pom on disk. > >> >> > > >> >> > For me, having been burned by not building the effective pom from a > >> clean > >> >> > checkout I actually favour the use of the release plugin, typically > >> for > >> >> CD > >> >> > I just have the next development version the same as the current > and > >> if > >> >> you > >> >> > tune your preparationGoals then you can just have one compile test > >> >> cycle... > >> >> > > >> >> > But the fight of that blog is a bit like the idiotic quest people > >> have to > >> >> > run the tests once only with code coverage as part of the single > test > >> >> > execution... until you have been burned by the code coverage > affecting > >> >> > effective bytecode and preventing the synchronization bug from > being > >> >> caught > >> >> > by your tests (plus other test invalidating behaviours I have seen) > >> you > >> >> > will run around trying to get rid of the second test execution... > >> >> > > >> >> > Those who do not understand why we do things will be condemned to > >> repeat > >> >> > our mistakes that made us do things that way. > >> >> > > >> >> > Having said that, it is a good pressure to have people pushing the > >> "why > >> >> do > >> >> > we need to do it this way" envelope... perhaps it is time that we > >> need to > >> >> > ensure that the release plugin has a page outlining our rational > for > >> the > >> >> > current default behaviour, common ways to tweak it and stressing > that > >> we > >> >> > have provided a framework for releasing and others are welcome to > >> reuse > >> >> the > >> >> > framework in their own release plugins > >> >> > > >> >> > On 16 April 2016 at 06:01, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > Hi, > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Anyone practicing CD according to this blog? > >> >> > > https://axelfontaine.com/blog/dead-burried.html > >> >> > > > >> >> > > I can build locally, but have a huge concern on the pom deployed > at > >> >> maven > >> >> > > repo since it does NOT have the exact version > >> >> > > > >> >> > > If you do, please share your experience. Any hick up when you > >> introduce > >> >> > > this new practice? > >> >> > > > >> >> > > For our case, we have about 200 modules project and about 100 > dev + > >> qa > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Thanks > >> >> > > > >> >> > > -Dan > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org > >
