Thanks Stuart, very much appreciated

-D

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Stuart McCulloch <mccu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry, last week was very busy with work and family
>
> I’ve listed the necessary config changes in https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/MNG-6084
>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
>
>
> On Sunday, 11 September 2016 at 04:28, Dan Tran wrote:
>
> > @Stuart, ping :-)
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com (mailto:
> dant...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> >
> > > @Stuart, could you provide instructions on how to enable JSR 250
> support?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > -Dan
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com (mailto:
> dant...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > >
> > > > here you go https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6084
> > > >
> > > > Very much appreciated
> > > >
> > > > -Dan
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Stuart McCulloch <mccu...@gmail.com
> (mailto:mccu...@gmail.com)>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 at 19:05, Dan Tran wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Stuart
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for helping out.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have 3 mojos, sharing one singleton component which depends on
> > > > > another
> > > > > > singleton component thru injection. All working now via both
> injection
> > > > >
> > > > > type
> > > > > > ( after some cleanup)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > should I file a JIRA to enable JSR-250 support fo rmaven 3.4?
> > > > > Sure - send me the ticket number and I’ll add some commentary this
> > > > > weekend
> > > > > > looking forward to use it
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Dan
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Stuart McCulloch <
> mccu...@gmail.com (mailto:mccu...@gmail.com)
> > > > > (mailto:mccu...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Dan,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Constructor injection (and component injection) is working for
> me
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > Maven 3.3.9 if I follow the example in
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > http://maven.apache.org/maven-
> > > > > > > jsr330.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is your plugin code available somewhere?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PS. at the moment Maven doesn’t enable container support for
> JSR-250
> > > > > > > lifecycle, but it is implemented by Sisu under a feature flag:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://github.com/eclipse/sisu.plexus/blob/releases/0.3.
> > > > > > > 3/org.eclipse.sisu.plexus/src/org/codehaus/plexus/
> > > > > > > ContainerConfiguration.java#L62
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Cheers, Stuart
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wednesday, 31 August 2016 at 16:59, Dan Tran wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Thomas,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You are right!!! looking for how to fix this...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The only thing working for me is field injection at MOJO.
> event The
> > > > > > > > constructor injection ( as documented) at MOJO is not.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Dan
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Thomas Broyer <
> t.bro...@gmail.com (mailto:t.bro...@gmail.com)
> > > > > (mailto:t.bro...@gmail.com)
> > > > > > > (mailto:t.bro...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 8:43 AM Dan Tran <
> dant...@gmail.com (mailto:dant...@gmail.com)
> > > > > (mailto:dant...@gmail.com) (mailto:
> > > > > > > dant...@gmail.com (mailto:dant...@gmail.com))> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I have a need to inject my jsr330 component into my
> plugins[1]
> > > > > and I
> > > > > > > > > > found 2 issues
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1. @Inject under MOJO works, but my singleton component
> > > > > @PreDestroy
> > > > > > > never
> > > > > > > > > > got called
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > @PreDestroy is not part of JSR 330, it's a CDI thing, so no
> > > > > wonder
> > > > > > > it's not
> > > > > > > > > called.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to