Stephen Connolly wrote: > Hmmm I did some digging... > > https://maven.apache.org/ref/3.2.3/apidocs/org/apache/maven/artifact/handler/ArtifactHandler.html#isIncludesDependencies() > is i think the idea JvZ was hinting at. > > For the case where a shaded JAR shades *everything* then a custom > packaging will work as we could set this flag and it would stop the > transitive dependencies being propagated... but most people do not shade > *all* dependencies, rather they shade a subset. > > I think we may need to re-think how we do this or rethink the model being > read-only
Set the shaded dependencies as optional. This might at least technically produce the proper dependency tree for dependent artifacts. Cheers, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
