On 9/20/05, Wim Deblauwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And in Maven 1.x ? > > 2005/9/20, Edwin Punzalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > If you don't want to use the default artifact naming convention used by > > m2, you can set the filename of the package in your pom.xml like so: > > > > <project> > > ... > > <build> > > <finalName>name</finalName> > > </build> > > ... > > </project> > > > > with the above set, the output file will be: name.jar (or name.war, > > whatever the pom packaging is). > > > > > > ^_^ > > > > > > > > Wim Deblauwe wrote: > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >is there anybody that uses Maven and InstallShield? > > > > > >We have a problem using both together when we think about updates. > > >InstallShield can only update a file if it keeps the same name, but > since > > >Maven puts the version in the name, we have a problem there. Has > anybody > > >solved this problem in some way that is easy to maintain? Or can > > >InstallShield handle this but is our installer guy unaware of this? > > > > > >regards, > > > > > >Wim > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Look at the properites for the JAR plugin. -- Jamie Bisotti
