IIUC the point was, that the groupId should be javax.xml and not
java.xml.bind (the link given for this currently yields Application
error
(Rails)) .
I reported the proxies/settings.xml error as MNG-2305.
Greetings
Franz
Malachi de Ælfweald schrieb:
Yeah, I definitely agree that it should be under javax instead of
com.sun --
but that's just because com.sun is supposedly reserved for Sun internal;
whereas javax is reserved for JCP-authorized extensions.
Regarding the proxy bit.. So it seems like the correct solution
would be if
there is a way we can setup ibilio to MIRROR the java.net archive;
instead
of maintaining seperate copies...? Or for whatever process delivers
it to
java.net to deliver it to ibiblio as well.... hmmm...
BTW: Have you reported the Maven bug?
Malachi
On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regarding the location (javax.xml.bind versus java.xml) i had a mail
> sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] in mind saying
> .
> .
> .
>
> Please note, that the policy for the groupId is "javax.xml" and
"com.sun.xml" only. See also
http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry
> .
> .
> .
>
> Hosting at java.net is not appropriate for me, because i sit behind a
> proxy and there is an error in maven2 to the extent that only the
first
> proxy is considered in settings.xml (this is MNG-2305).
> Since access to http sites is indispensable i thus cannot access https
> sites with maven2.
>
> Greetings
>
> Franz
>
> Malachi de Ælfweald schrieb:
> > We should be using the latest version of JAXB, which is 2.0.2 as
per the
> > website. Personally, I was not aware that the jars made it onto
> > ibilio -- I
> > thought they were supposed to be hosted at java.net?
> >
> > Out of curiousity, why would javax.xml.bind be incorrect for XML
> > Databinding?
> >
> > Malachi
> >
> > On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in
Maven2?
> >> In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are
jaxb-api jaxb-impl
> >> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
> >> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but
there
> >> are
> >> several things wrong/missing with this:
> >>
> >> - jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
> >> - version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime.
> >> - it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
> >> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
> >>
> >> Will there be any progress/cleanup for this?
> >>
> >> Thanks and best regards
> >>
> >> Franz
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
