Yeah, I definitely agree that it should be under javax instead of com.sun -- but that's just because com.sun is supposedly reserved for Sun internal; whereas javax is reserved for JCP-authorized extensions.
Regarding the proxy bit.. So it seems like the correct solution would be if there is a way we can setup ibilio to MIRROR the java.net archive; instead of maintaining seperate copies...? Or for whatever process delivers it to java.net to deliver it to ibiblio as well.... hmmm... BTW: Have you reported the Maven bug? Malachi On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Regarding the location (javax.xml.bind versus java.xml) i had a mail sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] in mind saying . . . Please note, that the policy for the groupId is "javax.xml" and " com.sun.xml" only. See also http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry . . . Hosting at java.net is not appropriate for me, because i sit behind a proxy and there is an error in maven2 to the extent that only the first proxy is considered in settings.xml (this is MNG-2305). Since access to http sites is indispensable i thus cannot access https sites with maven2. Greetings Franz Malachi de Ælfweald schrieb: > We should be using the latest version of JAXB, which is 2.0.2 as per the > website. Personally, I was not aware that the jars made it onto > ibilio -- I > thought they were supposed to be hosted at java.net? > > Out of curiousity, why would javax.xml.bind be incorrect for XML > Databinding? > > Malachi > > On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in Maven2? >> In http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are jaxb-api jaxb-impl >> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3. >> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind, but there >> are >> several things wrong/missing with this: >> >> - jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing. >> - version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the meantime. >> - it has been mentioned on this list, that the location >> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one. >> >> Will there be any progress/cleanup for this? >> >> Thanks and best regards >> >> Franz >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
