Is that supposed to be advantageous? If I want to run a lot of tests, then yea. Otherwise I need to take care while naming my tests
Wendy Smoak-3 wrote: > > On 9/23/07, zalym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> It works without the package name right? When I give the test with the >> package name, it exits with a no tests to run message, where as when I >> try >> without the packagename, then it works. > > Correct. It uses a pattern like **/*${test} so you don't need the > package name/directory path. > > -- > Wendy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Running-a-single-JUnit-test-tf4179089s177.html#a12851587 Sent from the Maven - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]