ok I didn't think about that. It can be a usable workaround. Thx
Arnaud On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Jörg Schaible < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Arnaud, > > Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > I think it is not the same problem. > > MWAR-131 is about to reuse classes defined in a war. > > attachClasses will generate a secondary artifact that we'll be able > > to reuse as dependency in another project. > > Yes, this "other project" might be the ear ... > > > The problem for skinny WARs is that EARs didn't package WARs > > transitive dependencies. > > It's not about classes bundled in the war (which are always in the > > war). > > ... and the attached jar will transport the transitive deps. > > - Jörg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
