Hi Paul, Paul Hammant wrote:
> There was a conversion on this list in August that suggested jarjar, > minijar & shade style of working. > > Selenium needs to bundle Jetty in its server jar. Jetty is > notoriously hard to 'shade' given there are a gazillion fine grained > issues around reflection and other dependancies like the servlet api > (should that be shaded too ?). > > The Uberjar way would preserve original class names, but hide them all > from other things in the classpath. Selenium server is booted from > the command line via a main() method obviously - thus it is an ideal > case for Uberjar > > Did anyone quantify how much and in what way things were slower with > Uberjar ? I had once a client connecting to a WLS and added the weblogic.jar to its deps. I used the uberjar to have one fine single jar to start anything. Well, after 45min the application actually was ready after startup. Without the uberjar it took less then 30sec. Questions? ;-) - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
