There's one-jar now as a replacement for uber-jar.
It looks much faster - I'm running with that.
Cheers,
- Paul
On Dec 10, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Paul,
Paul Hammant wrote:
There was a conversion on this list in August that suggested jarjar,
minijar & shade style of working.
Selenium needs to bundle Jetty in its server jar. Jetty is
notoriously hard to 'shade' given there are a gazillion fine grained
issues around reflection and other dependancies like the servlet api
(should that be shaded too ?).
The Uberjar way would preserve original class names, but hide them
all
from other things in the classpath. Selenium server is booted from
the command line via a main() method obviously - thus it is an ideal
case for Uberjar
Did anyone quantify how much and in what way things were slower with
Uberjar ?
I had once a client connecting to a WLS and added the weblogic.jar
to its
deps. I used the uberjar to have one fine single jar to start
anything.
Well, after 45min the application actually was ready after startup.
Without
the uberjar it took less then 30sec. Questions? ;-)
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
