On Thu, Nov 03, 2005, Stipe Tolj wrote: > how about adding a "supported phone" database here? in order to have a > clear table with phones that have been tested. > BTW, I'd like to have that then having 2 attributes, like: > * phone XYZ tested via Kannel WAP GW 1.x.x > * phone XYZ tested via Mbuni MMS GW 1.x.x
Bah, if you want to maintain it, feel free to, but big companies are spending big bucks to analyze in the scary details how phones are interoperable with each other and it's a very complex task: - depends on the content you make transit (number of slides in the MMS, text, audio, format of audio, video, format of the video, encodings, ...) - depends on phone hardware, OS, language - depends on used MMS-C Having a small list of phones "tested with Mbuni" is nice, but it won't cover the full range of bugs one encounters when playing with MMS clients. I think that Mbuni should simply list the standards it follows, and the biggest problem in the FAQ. Cheers, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "What do we want? BRAINS! When do we want it? BRAINS!" _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@mbuni.org http://mbuni.org/mailman/listinfo/users_mbuni.org
