For multiplexing only, I guess using SSH might be a bit overkill given all the security aspects, though you can make those much lighter by configuring the SSH protocol to not use enryption by using the "none" cipher. Though I don't know if there is any better protocol specialized in multiplexing ...
I'll try to have another look at the port forwarding thing to see if i can fix more issues. On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 14:24, Lukas Nießen <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 27.10.2009 20:51 schrieb Guillaume Nodet: >> >> I've attached a new patch to SSHD-40 which addresses the stability >> issues. I've done a bit of testing and haven't found any problems >> but those were not real load tests ... Please have a look, i'm eager >> for feedback on that one. > > Thanks for your work, great! From your comment on the patches-site, I > followed that you integrated your solution into the main svn branch, so I > checked out the svn version and used it instead of patching. I've done some > testing, and it seems to work by far better than before. However, there > still seems to be some (rather minor) issues. I did the same setup as > described in my previous post, and many pages now load flawlessly, but > others don't. These pages load most of their objects, but a few seem still > to be missing. As far as I can see from the browser status bar, the missing > objects are from some ad server or so. Examples for this behaviour include > the pages > www.focus.de > www.yahoo.de > www.bbc.co.uk/history/recent/troubles > www.bahn.de > (Sorry for being in German, but they belong to my test pages and it doesn't > really matter here ;)) > > Unfortunately, I've no clue where this behaviour may result from... > > Btw, as someone who should know the SSH protocol very good I ask you: Do you > think it is a good idea to use the SSH protocol just for multiplexing (I > don't need all the authentication and encryption stuff...) or do you happen > to know a better suited protocol? If you're interested, I can of course > describe in more detail what I'm willing to do. > > Again thank you very much, excellent work. Keep it up! And I'd be happy to > contribute any stack traces whatsoever, but unfortunately, I'm not sure if > I'm able to find the bug in the code... ;) > > Lukas > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
