> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Michiel Meeuwissen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: donderdag 11 maart 2004 10:44 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: Re: imagemagick and text > > > Ernst Bunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > It ****s only if you're not using ASCII, and I think Sun is > > > to blame, with > > > > their silly changes in Runtime.exec. > > > > very surprising. well, should that make us think about > using jai? That would > > certainly solve the problem (hey, why am i getting this 'ol > microsoft > > fealing?), but i tried using jai with linux, and i got > stranded becouse it > > starts looking for an x service (why???), and wouldn't find > it even though > > it was there. These problems don't exist on windows. > > My plan was actually to take a look at the java-interface for > imagemagick > which is existing too. So, a third implementation of ImageConverter.
that would be an excellent solution. but wouldn't it be logical to replace the current imagemagick implementation with the java interface based one? of corse there would have to be no compatibility issues.. ernst > > I've no idea if that would enables us to add texts to images > decently, but > one would say so... I'm not even sure that this library is not calling > Runtime.exec, but I suppose that it's not... > > JAI is not nearly as powerful as imagemagick. > > Michiel > > > -- > Michiel Meeuwissen > Mediapark C101 Hilversum > +31 (0)35 6772979 > nl_NL eo_XX en_US > mihxil' > [] () >
