Thank you. It works now.  I tried it before but I used SYSTEM instead of
PUBLIC in the doctype. 

Btw, I've done struts webapps also and I didn't have to use a local dtd.
So I still think it's a myfaces problem. Maybe when myfaces parses the
web.xml, it is calling an API that forces validation against the dtd?

Anyway, I have the solution now. Thanks to everybody who chimed in.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:02 PM
To: 'MyFaces Discussion'
Subject: RE: MyFaces with Weblogic


You can just change the reference to the dtd to a local reference -
weblogic will not call out to the web then. I think tomcat has a
mechanism to lookup the dtd inside WEB-INF, whereas weblogic tries to
obey the reference and look it up. As far as I remember, there is a
switch somewhere in the weblogic.xml to change this beahvior.

This is not a myfaces-problem: You will have this problem with all
jakarta-webapps (eg. Struts), as they all rely on this fallback to dtds
in the WEB-INF. 

Cheers
stf

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2005 19:00
> To: myfaces-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: MyFaces with Weblogic
> 
> I went to great effort myself.  Spent about three work days
> but could never get it going.  But in my case I was using 
> struts-faces.
> 
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/23/2005 6:26:52 AM >>>
> Has anybody on this list successfully run MyFaces on Weblogic 8.1?
> 
> 
> **************************************************************
> *********
> Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation,
> solicitation, offer or agreement or any information about any 
> transaction, customer account or account activity contained 
> in this communication.
> **************************************************************
> *********
> 



***********************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation,
offer or agreement or any information about any transaction, customer
account or account activity contained in this communication.
***********************************************************************

Reply via email to