Tim, I do not yet have commit privileges to the CVS server. Otherwise the changes would be in the trunk by now. Do you know how to apply CVS patches? If so, I can send you the necessary stuff so you can test this functionality.
One big feature coming soon is the ability to hide the root node if you want. Also, you may not know this, but there is the ability to hide the nav icons (plus/minus icons) if you are doing server side only (you obviously need them for client side expansion.) Plus there is the ability to turn off the connecting lines. I am working on some documentation for the component. Actually we are talking about making a standard online documentation format for each component and providing simplified examples for each (that are not nested inside the tabbed pane like myfaces-examples is now.) - sean On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:59:45 -0600, Tim Pyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So far everything but the client side changes is working great. I was > able to make very small mods to my original TreeModelAdapter to the new > TreeNode version. Again, other than the logging and client-side saving, > I have not run into any problems. Works great so far. You mention a new > version with the client-side toggling issue resolved... is this up on > the trunk yet? I would really like to get it and try it out when it is > available. > > PS.... I really appreciate yor quick response to my problem.. you > rock!!!!! > > Tim > > On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 10:12, Sean Schofield wrote: > > Let me look into it. There are definitely ways to cut down on the log > > messages. Come to think of it, I'm not sure I have logging configured > > when I run my examples. Anyways, there are ways to filter out log > > messages of certain levels, from certain classes, etc. > > > > In the meantime, I'd appreciate any feedback on tree2. Also, I have > > already implemented an improvement so that if you are using > > client-side toggling it can remember your client side toggle changes > > between page requests (if you have session cookies enabled.) > > > > sean > > > > > > On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:07:25 -0600, Tim Pyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am indeed using myfaces implementation. I did not get these warnings > > > with the first tree, but I was also using older version of myfaces. I am > > > using the latest source from CVS. The tree works great, and well, > > > everything works great.... just wish I could kill the warning message > > > about myfaces having to assign an ID. So this might not be as much of a > > > question for the tree2 component as much as it is for the myfaces engine > > > itself. And I get one of those warnings for each node in the tree, so I > > > would just like to be able to turn that off so it doesn't waste log > > > space. > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 09:54, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > Are you using myfaces for JSF implementation or are you using another > > > > implementation? > > > > > > > > There are a lot of dynamically generated components inside the tree > > > > that use JSF's ability to generate an ID if none is specified. I > > > > haven't seen this message though, so that is why I am asking. > > > > > > > > Have you ever used h:dataTable (any implementation) before? I would > > > > imagine you would get similar messages. Tree2 is very similiar to > > > > dataTable in terms of how it has a few components that it uses by > > > > iterrating over lots of data (creating new ids for each row, column.) > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:10:54 -0600, Tim Pyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > With the new tree2 component, I get alot of these type of warnings: > > > > > > > > > > [exec] 17:28:48,873 INFO [Engine] StandardContext[/jport]WARNING: > > > > > Component treeForm2:tims_tree2:0:0:25:_id81 just got an automatic id, > > > > > because there was no id assigned yet. If this component was created > > > > > dynamically (i.e. not by a JSP tag) you should assign it an explicit > > > > > static id or assign it the id you get from the createUniqueId from the > > > > > current UIViewRoot component right after creation! > > > > > > > > > > Is there anyway to add an id to whatever isn't getting one? Or can I > > > > > just turn off this warning message altogether? > > > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
