[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the effects are really fancy ... but I would not call the component a
ajax component ... more like a javascript enabled component.
thats because there is no real communication necessary back to the
server, unless the state of the "puff away" objects is also represented
on the server ... e.g. if you reload the page they are still gone.
never the less it would be nice to have such a component :)
only my two cents.
Yes the main problem is, that ajax basically originally only stood for
javascript with xmlhttp and backend requests, it sort of becomes
a replacement buzzword for dhtml components.
So it is better to call the whole thing ajax instead of dhtml whatever.
