Does tree2 require a TreeModel for a @binding? For some situations, @binding might be prefferable over @value.
I've noticed that @value is required for tree2 in the 1.0.9 release. This is different from other components, where the application developer has a choose between the two optional attributes.
Dennis Byrne
- Re: [tree2] Problems with new TreeModel interface (need... Dennis_Byrne
- Re: [tree2] Problems with new TreeModel interface ... ir. ing. Jan Dockx
- Re: [tree2] Problems with new TreeModel interf... Sean Schofield
- Re: [tree2] Problems with new TreeModel in... Edwin Mercado
- Antwort: Re: [tree2] Problems with new Tre... mathias . werlitz
- Re: Antwort: Re: [tree2] Problems with... Dennis_Byrne
- Re: Re: [tree2] Problems with new Tree... Sean Schofield
- Antwort: Re: Re: [tree2] Problems... mathias . werlitz
- Antwort: Re: Re: [tree2] Prob... mathias . werlitz
- Re: Re: Re: [tree2] Probl... Sean Schofield
- Antwort: Re: Re: Re: [tre... mathias . werlitz

