Could you please rerun the metrics with the performance tuning suggestion found at: http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Performance
Thx. Mike --- jfaronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I grabbed the attachments from the original performance bug > https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3 and ran some > JMeter tests against the "JSP only" and the JSF versions. > > The pages are really simple, the JSP version outputs a page which is > visually identical to the JSF page. The table in question had 10 columns and > 50 - 200 rows. Not a huge amount of data. I used MyFaces 1.1.3 as the JSF > implementation and ran the test in JBoss 4.0.4 GA running on JDK 1.4.2. > > Here's the results: > > > > Table Rows Average [ms] Median [ms] Hits / Min Samples > JSF Testcase 50 36 30 1300 5007 > JSP Testcase 50 14 10 4030 5001 > JSF Testcase 100 56 60 1050 5001 > JSP Testcase 100 21 20 2700 5001 > JSF Testcase 200 100 100 590 5001 > JSP Testcase 200 26 30 2170 5001 > > > > This data confirms the discussion in the sun forum. The JSF version started > out nearly three times slower than the JSP page. The relative performance of > the JSF version degraded to nearly four times slower as table rows were > added. > > So if you are thinking about adopting JSF you should be aware of the > performance hit and make sure that you can architect around the problem or > get the performance benchmarks adjusted. Perceived performance is important > in real life projects so it's more than a theoretical problem. > > I'd also like to know if anybody has ideas or code samples that make JSF > perform better? > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/JSF-Performance-Problems-tf1912565.html#a5236070 > Sent from the MyFaces - Users forum at Nabble.com. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
