Hold on, hold on. The PPR technology we devised for integration into tomahawk is server-side compatible with what Trinidad does (also what the user has to do to get it working and the developer interface is similar to Trinidad).
The client-side is completely rewritten, but we hope that we will be able to integrate this into Trinidad as well, as the client-side code of ADF-Faces is still dependent on the rather outdated IFRAME approach, and we wanted (and for consistency needed) to use dojo. In any case, I definitely think that MyFaces tomahawk needs a working, reliable, directly integrated AJAX framework to have any future as a component library - everything else put aside. regards, Martin On 8/22/06, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Double? Don't you mean triple, quadruple or maybe even quintuple? Between MyFaces, JSF-RI, Struts, Tiles, Shale, Shale-Clay, Facelets, JBoss-Seam, EJB3, Hibernate, Spring, AjaxAnywhere, Ajax4Jsf, Trinidad, Tobago, and others it is amazing that new developers even try to learn the technology instead of saying I give up. I like options, but I wonder if we are stretching open source developers too thin on continuously reinventing the wheel. On 8/22/06, Rogerio Pereira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2006/8/22, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Also a short note, Ernst Fastl is working on something similar > > > as we speak, it will be called partial page rendering > > > > that name sounds familar... > > is the goal now double everything? > > > i agree > >
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
