do you have numbers for that "better than struts" ?
On 11/16/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He should definitely take the Trinidad component set for high performance requirements, with this, you're in the same region as Struts for performance (probably better - cause if you do it yourself, you won't get the same optimized state-saving as is implemented in Trinidad). regards, Martin On 11/15/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, before anyone is falling down the chair because I ask this question. > Here we go. A friend of mine is looking for a struts replacement > framework covering extranet sites. > > Well here we go, my experience with jsf in the past is, that it was not > too suitable for extranet, but is a perfect choice for intranet sites. > The reason, higher overhead than plain lean frameworks only covering a > minimalistic approach. > > The situation has changed however, facelets give a huge performance > boost due to good caching. > But I lack experience, I know several bigger intranet installations, > but extranet is a fully different beast. > > So my question how good does jsf scale nowadays in those cases. > Does anyone have any experience or samples? > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
