Agree, it's the same for javascript, crawlers don't use it. You have 2
possible case
1) there is a form to proceed. Then you can use button, you anyway don't
want your crawler to submit your forms
2) There is no form to proceed. Then you can use the simple outputLink.

En l'instant précis du 02/22/07 12:53, Veit Guna s'exprimait en ces termes:
> :).
>
> For form submit's - I'm on your side. But for simple links? Also I don't
> think that searchengines will press buttons when they crawl a page
> because usually buttons submit forms :)...
>
>
>
> David Delbecq schrieb:
>   
>> Well that's the problem, if you don't want to use javascript and want to
>> submit a form, all you can do is use a button.
>> Replacing your link with buttons might be odd, but with a bit o css, you
>> can remove all borders and margin around the button, make it inline
>> paragraph and have it look like a link :)
>>
>> En l'instant précis du 02/22/07 11:02, Veit Guna s'exprimait en ces termes:
>>     
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Normally, you want to execute some view logic when pressing a link - not
>>> only to post forms. Since the JS-free outputLink doesn't have an action
>>> attribute, this can't be used for a replacement for commandLink.
>>> Replacing all links with buttons seems odd to me...
>>>
>>> No other solutions?
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Veit
>>>
>>>
>>> Simon Kitching schrieb:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Replacing all commandLinks with commandButtons seems the best solution
>>>> to me. After all, if you were using some other tech like CGI or PHP or
>>>> whatever you still couldn't submit a form using an <a> tag without
>>>> javascript. It's just not possible with HTML.
>>>>
>>>> The h:commandLink tag is really an optional feature over and above
>>>> normal html, which is why javascript is needed to implement it on the
>>>> client side.
>>>>
>>>> Note that this only applies where the link *submits a form*. Ordinary
>>>> links can be output using h:outputLink - but they won't submit the form.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> lightbulb432 wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> I see, so what do developers of JSF applications generally do -
>>>>> replace all
>>>>> commandLinks with commandButtons, or only users with JavaScript
>>>>> enabled to
>>>>> access their site? What strategy do some of you use with regards to users
>>>>> out there who don't enable JavaScript (which isn't as small a number as I
>>>>> would've thought)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> craigmcc wrote:
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On 12/21/06, lightbulb432 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Why does JSF always use JavaScript to submit a form rather than through
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> regular method of form submission?
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> That only happens for a commandLink component (i.e. a hyperlink that
>>>>>> is to
>>>>>> submit a form).  If you use a commandButton component, no JavaScript is
>>>>>> needed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is your entire JSF web application useless for clients that have
>>>>>> JavaScript
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> turned off?
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Only for hyperlinks.  If you can describe a way to have a hyperlink
>>>>>> submit
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> form, without Javascript being enabled, we would love to hear it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>     

Reply via email to