LOL, I guess I don't pay attention to who is replying sometimes. Thanks
On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LOL - I'd already replied to that! I'll give your suggestion a try and shall take a fresh look at your post... Cheers, Chris. (aka lowecg2004) On 5/30/07, Brian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was just thinking of the USE_APPLICATION_VIEW_CACHE context parameter > in web.xml. This can cache view state and the Trinidad Dev guide says > it can cause some unexpected behavior in rare cases. Make sure you have > this set to False (good for development anyway). > > I am currently having trouble migrating to JBoss 4.2 as well. It seems > that Ajax4JSF is causing me some trouble. It is now required to be part of > a Seam Project in JBoss 4.2 (The seam filter installs the A4J filter > automatically). > > If you have any thoughts on this I would appreciate it. > > http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=109711 > > On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > Brian - I'm not sure how to test for this, did you have anything in > > mind? > > > > Adam - are you familiar with the "Seam-Discs" Trinidad example? > > > > http://pmuir.bleepbleep.org.uk/2007/04/seamdiscs-jboss-seam-and-apache.html > > > > > > I have made a minor mod to this and can reproduce the behaviour. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Chris > > > > > > On 5/30/07, Brian Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > Just an off the wall guess, but this couldn't be some sort of goofy > > > caching issue? > > > > > > On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > > > > Is there anything I can do to help narrow this down? > > > > > > > > On 5/30/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hrm, that looks like the same version as Glassfish! I > > > > > didn't know they were using the RI. So scrap that theory! > > > > > It still *might* be something wrong in JBoss (maybe their > > > > > implementation of JspIdConsumer in the JSP engine?), > > > > > but this is more puzzling. > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for the reply Adam. > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you happen to know what version of JSF Glassfish is using? > > > > > > > > > > > > From jsf-api.jar that is with JBoss 4.2.0.GA<http://4.2.0.ga/>, > > > > > the manifest states: > > > > > > > > > > > > Manifest-Version: 1.0 > > > > > > Specification-Title: JavaServer Faces > > > > > > Created-By: 1.5.0_04-b05 (Sun Microsystems Inc.) > > > > > > Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.6.5 > > > > > > Implementation-Title: Sun Microsystems JavaServer Faces > > > > > Implementation > > > > > > Specification-Vendor: JBoss (http://www.jboss.org/) > > > > > > Specification-Version: 1.2MR1 > > > > > > Implementation-Vendor-Id: com.sun > > > > > > Extension-Name: javax.faces > > > > > > Implementation-Version: 1.2_04-b10-p01 > > > > > > Implementation-Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc. > > > > > > Implementation-URL: http://www.jboss.org/ > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/30/07, Adam Winer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I suspect that there's something wrong with > > > > > > > the implementation of JSF 1.2 used by JBoss, probably > > > > > > > in that implementation's UIComponentClassicTagBase > > > > > > > code or something similar. The behavior you're describing > > > > > > > doesn't occur with Glassfish. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/30/07, Chris Lowe < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a project that is running Trinidad and I recently > > > > > upgraded to > > > > > > JBoss > > > > > > > > 4.2.0.GA <http://4.2.0.ga/>. As part of this upgrade I > > > > > also migrated to JSF 1.2 (the > > > > > > latest > > > > > > > > Seam version requires me to do this). Ever since then, > > > > > whenever I > > > > > > submit a > > > > > > > > form that fails validation, the form renders the correct > > > > > validation > > > > > > messages > > > > > > > > but I get some weird rendering of the form. It's actually > > > > > like the > > > > > > previous > > > > > > > > HTML doesn't get cleared and the new form + validation > > > > > errors gets > > > > > > tacked > > > > > > > > onto the end - I'm literally seeing double. If I click my > > > > > submit button > > > > > > > > again, then a third instance will be tacked onto the > > > > > bottom, and so on. > > > > > > If > > > > > > > > at this point I simply refresh the page, then everything > > > > > resets back to > > > > > > > > normal. If I use the application without causing > > > > > validation errors then > > > > > > > > everything works as normal. I get the same behaviour on > > > > > FireFox and IE > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > there are no exceptions in the logs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried updating the Trinidad build to > > > > > > trinidad-*-1.2-07-may-SNAPSHOT.jar, > > > > > > > > but to no avail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I eventually tracked the strange behaviour down to my > > > > > usage of > > > > > > <trh:body>, > > > > > > > > if I use a vanilla body tag then the page duplication > > > > > problem goes. > > > > > > > > However, I still get similar issues with <tr:commandLink> > > > > > - the instance > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > the link is duplicated with each form submission that > > > > > causes a > > > > > > validation > > > > > > > > error. Changing to <h:commandLink> again, resolves this > > > > > issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone come across this before? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
