Hi! > I think it would be nice also to see an attractive example > application (separated from others) where Orchestra is used in > conjunction with Absolutely, you might not being able to imagine how much I'd appreaciate such a demo application. Any plan to volunteer? :-)
> -minimal applicationContext.xml configuration: is possible to not > require all that scope configuration?, Currently, no. But I think it would be possible to provide a simple bean factory which configures a default setup with spring. On the other hand, one strength (as I see) of Orchestra is it's flexibility. E.g. You can have Scopes with or without timeout, with our without auto-invalidation if bean has not been accessed and with or without persistence. Not sure what the default should be. My personal favorite is a scope with the following attributes. "Invalidate if not accessed (previously flash-scope now access-scope) using timeout and persistence". But I am pretty sure that many other people would like to see a different default setup. > -minimal faces-config: is it possible to move some of the > <application> artifacts in the orchestra JAR? I'd like to keep them optional as they might have any influence to your application, though, the RedirectTracker is nearly a requirement to see messages if a conversation has timed-out and you use the @ConversationRequire annotation. Ciao, Mario
