Hi, I want to raise one more point here,ie the 'open source' and 'proprietary' ,I think the decision of tech looks on this also. For those who looking for open source components with better development prefer for 'Trinidad' because ADF is an proprietary but,we can get more features. Correct is i'm wrong.
Thanks, Ramesh. alvaro tovar wrote: > > hello > i think that both are good, but i found 1 problem of compatibility > betewn they, and the ajax components. finally i have to lave out both > framework because my app need to be to fast and they create many js > and css. > regards > > 2009/1/27 Bjørn T Johansen <b...@havleik.no>: >> I am starting developing a new webapp and started looking at Trinidad and >> it looks like a good thing to use.. Then a >> friend told me I had to look at RichFaces and it also looks quite good... >> Which one do I choose? What is their pros and >> cons? (I haven't used either before...) >> >> >> Regards, >> >> BTJ >> >> -- >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Bjørn T Johansen >> >> b...@havleik.no >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Someone wrote: >> "I understand that if you play a Windows CD backwards you hear strange >> Satanic messages" >> To which someone replied: >> "It's even worse than that; play it forwards and it installs Windows" >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Trinidad-or-RichFaces--or-both--tp21695717p21703774.html Sent from the MyFaces - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
