Hi, In JSF 2.0 you don't have to configure a view handler. It will decide whether to use the new Facelets- or the JSP-ViewDeclarationLanguage in the default ViewHandlerImpl.
Regards, Jakob 2010/4/7 Matthias Leis <matthias.l...@gmx.net> > You are right about the view handler. I forgot that JSF2 doesn't need > afaces-config anymore. But I need it anyway for registering a phase > listener. Anyway, if I remove the view handler from the faces-config, all I > get from my webapp is a blank page and no errors. Do I have to define a > view-handler if I use a faces-config file or does JSF just use the dafault > view handler? > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > Datum: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 08:54:02 +0200 > > Von: Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> > > An: users@myfaces.apache.org > > Betreff: Re: javascript error "jsf is not defined" > > > Am 07.04.10 08:14, schrieb Matthias Leis: > > > Hi Jakob, > > > > > > I guess I use the built-in facelets. At least this is the code from > > faces-config: > > > <view-handler> > > > com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler > > > </view-handler> > > Wrong view handler... the jsf2 one is not under com.sun, but under > > javax.faces.view.facelets and it is initialized automatically if you use > > myfaces and the jsf2 facelets (no further configuration is needed) > > Com sun is the old Facelet 1.x stuff and the new tags cannot work under > > it due to the extensions in the jsf2 lifecycle and view handler api. > > So it is either old facelets or the jsf2 one but not a mix of both, sort > > of a hard break introduced by the namespace change from com.sun into > > javax.facelets and due to the api changes, but better once a hard break > > from old habits than having endless pain :-) > > > > Basically if you run in a pure jsf2 environment you can start to use > > facelets without additional configuration on the faces-config side. > > > > Werner > > > > -- > GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! > Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 >
