Thank you Dominik. Just to be clear: the aim is not simply compete... I think Trinidad has: - rock solid back-end; - support to non-javascript browser (I have applications running in old data collectors - windows mobile) ... and I would like to keep most of the java code untouched when migrating my applications to an "up to date UI".
I am personally highly involved in another open source project and I don't have much experience with JSF/Trinidad internals. I am not sure I can help much in such a task (create the new render kit), but I'm experimenting to see if I should go ahead with Trinidad or just migrate to another library. Best regards, Walter Mourão http://waltermourao.com.br http://arcadian.com.br http://oriens.com.br 2011/3/6 Dominik Dorn <domi...@dominikdorn.com> > If you're really want to compete with PrettyFaces, IceFaces, RichFaces > etc., > I suggest to take a look at > > http://demo.sproutcore.com/sample_controls/ > http://www.sproutcore.com > > and rebuilt those for JSF. > Sproutcore is currently quite hyped in twitter and gains a lot of > interest, especially > in the rails community. > > > > > 2011/3/6 Walter Mourão <walter.mou...@gmail.com>: > > Hi folks, > > following the thread "Concerns about the future of Trinidad" I would like > to > > know the opinions about the "best' Javascript package to use as a base to > a > > new Trinidad render kit. > > > > JQuery <http://jquery.org/> > > > > Dojo Toolkit <http://dojotoolkit.org/> > > > > (another options ?) > > > > What do you think ? what about the licensing ? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Walter Mourão > > http://waltermourao.com.br > > http://arcadian.com.br > > http://oriens.com.br > > > > > > -- > Dominik Dorn > http://dominikdorn.com > http://twitter.com/domdorn > > Tausche Deine Lernunterlagen auf http://wu.studyguru.eu ! >
