Like I say we use it at Oracle.. Are you guys using the trunk or the released version? There have been a number of bug fixes lately and we're overdue for a release, but I want to make sure it works in your usecase before I do the next release..
Sent from my iPhone On Jul 17, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Luka Surija <l...@iytim.hr> wrote: > Welcome to the club, something in development of this combination Trinidad 2 > + Facelets + JSF2 went terribly wrong. After couple of years using Trinidad > 1.2 + JSF 1.2 + Facelets in big enterprise applications, I've spent more then > a MONTH to make something more complicated then "Hello World" application > without big success. My heavy and painful decision (now I have to rewrite all > existing apps in something other - Vaadin) was to finally give up from > Trinidad and JSF2 technology because it's a joke in terms of stability. And > in other hand, Java 5 EE reached some time ago EOL!? > > Luka Surija > > > > On 07/17/2011 03:11 AM, Manuel Hartl wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> my rearch to get trinidad2 with facelets working gets more confusing.. >> >> the following was tested with >> mojarra 2.0.2-b10 and 2.0.6 >> trinidad-2.0.0 and trinidad-2.0.1-SNAPSHOT (executed von 17th of July) >> >> web.xml-parameters: >> <context-param> >> <param-name>javax.faces.DEFAULT_SUFFIX</param-name> >> <param-value>.xhtml</param-value> >> </context-param> >> <context-param> >> <param-name>javax.faces.PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING</param-name> >> <param-value>false</param-value> >> </context-param> >> <context-param> >> <param-name>javax.faces.PROJECT_STAGE</param-name> >> <param-value>Development</param-value> >> </context-param> >> <context-param> >> <param-name>javax.faces.STATE_SAVING_METHOD</param-name> >> <param-value>client</param-value> >> </context-param> >> <context-param> >> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.COMPRESS_STATE_IN_CLIENT</param-name> >> <param-value>true</param-value> >> </context-param> >> <context-param> >> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CACHE_VIEW_ROOT</param-name> >> <param-value>false</param-value> >> </context-param> >> <context-param> >> >> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CLIENT_STATE_METHOD</param-name> >> <param-value>token</param-value> >> </context-param> >> <context-param> >> >> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.DISABLE_CONTENT_COMPRESSION</param-name> >> <param-value>true</param-value> >> </context-param> >> <context-param> >> >> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.ENABLE_LIGHTWEIGHT_DIALOGS</param-name> >> <param-value>true</param-value> >> </context-param> >> <context-param> >> >> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.ENABLE_PPR_OPTIMIZATION</param-name> >> <param-value>false</param-value> >> </context-param> >> >> >> >> >> 1) the problem with tr/trh tags not rendered can be workaround by >> setting the renderKitId-Attribut of f:view/f:subview to >> "org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.core". >> it seems that the default-render-kit-id in the faces-config.xml is just >> ignored. >> >> Can someone explain this? >> >> 2) Now the first page is displayed, any following page gives the >> following exception. It seems this is a problem with the format of >> viewState stored in the hidden form field: >> >> java.io.IOException: Not in GZIP format >> at java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream.readHeader(GZIPInputStream.java:143) >> at java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream.<init>(GZIPInputStream.java:58) >> at java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream.<init>(GZIPInputStream.java:67) >> at >> com.sun.faces.renderkit.ClientSideStateHelper.doGetState(ClientSideStateHelper.java:231) >> at >> com.sun.faces.renderkit.ClientSideStateHelper.getState(ClientSideStateHelper.java:198) >> at >> com.sun.faces.renderkit.ResponseStateManagerImpl.getState(ResponseStateManagerImpl.java:100) >> at >> com.sun.faces.renderkit.ResponseStateManagerImpl.getTreeStructureToRestore(ResponseStateManagerImpl.java:148) >> at >> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.StateManagerImpl.restoreView(StateManagerImpl.java:584) >> at >> com.sun.faces.application.view.ViewHandlingStrategy.restoreView(ViewHandlingStrategy.java:123) >> at >> com.sun.faces.application.view.FaceletViewHandlingStrategy.restoreView(FaceletViewHandlingStrategy.java:448) >> at >> com.sun.faces.application.view.MultiViewHandler.restoreView(MultiViewHandler.java:148) >> at >> javax.faces.application.ViewHandlerWrapper.restoreView(ViewHandlerWrapper.java:288) >> >> >> The more i dig into this, the more doubts raise, that anyone is using >> trinidad2 (with facelets) really... >> >> Regards, >> Manuel. >> >>
