Luka, this could be my bad.. Let me check the repositories and get back to you..
Sent from my iPad On Jul 20, 2011, at 6:35 AM, Luka Surija <l...@iytim.hr> wrote: > Hi Max, > I'll try it as soon i get some spare time. > > P.S. Last couple of months I have problems compiling trinidad 2 trunk: > > Plugin org.apache.myfaces.trinidadbuild:maven-xrts-plugin:2.0.6 or one of its > dependencies could not be resolved: Failed to read artifact descriptor for > org.apache.myfaces.trinidadbuild:maven-xrts-plugin:jar:2.0.6: Could not find > artifact org.apache.myfaces.trinidadbuild:maven-xrts-plugin:pom:2.0.6 in > central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2) -> [Help 1] > > Do you have any idea how to solve this? > > Tnx and regards, > > Luka Surija > > > On 19.07.2011 20:51, Max Starets wrote: >> Luka, >> >> I updated the JIRA with two workarounds for this issue. I will also provide >> a fix soon. >> >> For now, you can just disable debug output in trinidad-config (you don't >> want to have it in production anyways). >> >> Max >> >> On 7/18/2011 10:43 AM, Max Starets wrote: >>> Luka, >>> >>> I know that you have logged TRINIDAD-2107. I haven't been able to take a >>> look at it yet unfortunately, but will do so this week. >>> Were there other problems? >>> >>> Max >>> >>> On 7/17/2011 6:23 PM, Luka Surija wrote: >>>> Welcome to the club, something in development of this combination Trinidad >>>> 2 + Facelets + JSF2 went terribly wrong. After couple of years using >>>> Trinidad 1.2 + JSF 1.2 + Facelets in big enterprise applications, I've >>>> spent more then a MONTH to make something more complicated then "Hello >>>> World" application without big success. My heavy and painful decision (now >>>> I have to rewrite all existing apps in something other - Vaadin) was to >>>> finally give up from Trinidad and JSF2 technology because it's a joke in >>>> terms of stability. And in other hand, Java 5 EE reached some time ago >>>> EOL!? >>>> >>>> Luka Surija >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 07/17/2011 03:11 AM, Manuel Hartl wrote: >>>>> Hi list, >>>>> >>>>> my rearch to get trinidad2 with facelets working gets more confusing.. >>>>> >>>>> the following was tested with >>>>> mojarra 2.0.2-b10 and 2.0.6 >>>>> trinidad-2.0.0 and trinidad-2.0.1-SNAPSHOT (executed von 17th of July) >>>>> >>>>> web.xml-parameters: >>>>> <context-param> >>>>> <param-name>javax.faces.DEFAULT_SUFFIX</param-name> >>>>> <param-value>.xhtml</param-value> >>>>> </context-param> >>>>> <context-param> >>>>> <param-name>javax.faces.PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING</param-name> >>>>> <param-value>false</param-value> >>>>> </context-param> >>>>> <context-param> >>>>> <param-name>javax.faces.PROJECT_STAGE</param-name> >>>>> <param-value>Development</param-value> >>>>> </context-param> >>>>> <context-param> >>>>> <param-name>javax.faces.STATE_SAVING_METHOD</param-name> >>>>> <param-value>client</param-value> >>>>> </context-param> >>>>> <context-param> >>>>> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.COMPRESS_STATE_IN_CLIENT</param-name> >>>>> <param-value>true</param-value> >>>>> </context-param> >>>>> <context-param> >>>>> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CACHE_VIEW_ROOT</param-name> >>>>> <param-value>false</param-value> >>>>> </context-param> >>>>> <context-param> >>>>> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CLIENT_STATE_METHOD</param-name> >>>>> <param-value>token</param-value> >>>>> </context-param> >>>>> <context-param> >>>>> >>>>> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.DISABLE_CONTENT_COMPRESSION</param-name> >>>>> <param-value>true</param-value> >>>>> </context-param> >>>>> <context-param> >>>>> >>>>> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.ENABLE_LIGHTWEIGHT_DIALOGS</param-name> >>>>> <param-value>true</param-value> >>>>> </context-param> >>>>> <context-param> >>>>> >>>>> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.ENABLE_PPR_OPTIMIZATION</param-name> >>>>> <param-value>false</param-value> >>>>> </context-param> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 1) the problem with tr/trh tags not rendered can be workaround by >>>>> setting the renderKitId-Attribut of f:view/f:subview to >>>>> "org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.core". >>>>> it seems that the default-render-kit-id in the faces-config.xml is just >>>>> ignored. >>>>> >>>>> Can someone explain this? >>>>> >>>>> 2) Now the first page is displayed, any following page gives the >>>>> following exception. It seems this is a problem with the format of >>>>> viewState stored in the hidden form field: >>>>> >>>>> java.io.IOException: Not in GZIP format >>>>> at java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream.readHeader(GZIPInputStream.java:143) >>>>> at java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream.<init>(GZIPInputStream.java:58) >>>>> at java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream.<init>(GZIPInputStream.java:67) >>>>> at >>>>> com.sun.faces.renderkit.ClientSideStateHelper.doGetState(ClientSideStateHelper.java:231) >>>>> at >>>>> com.sun.faces.renderkit.ClientSideStateHelper.getState(ClientSideStateHelper.java:198) >>>>> at >>>>> com.sun.faces.renderkit.ResponseStateManagerImpl.getState(ResponseStateManagerImpl.java:100) >>>>> at >>>>> com.sun.faces.renderkit.ResponseStateManagerImpl.getTreeStructureToRestore(ResponseStateManagerImpl.java:148) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.StateManagerImpl.restoreView(StateManagerImpl.java:584) >>>>> at >>>>> com.sun.faces.application.view.ViewHandlingStrategy.restoreView(ViewHandlingStrategy.java:123) >>>>> at >>>>> com.sun.faces.application.view.FaceletViewHandlingStrategy.restoreView(FaceletViewHandlingStrategy.java:448) >>>>> at >>>>> com.sun.faces.application.view.MultiViewHandler.restoreView(MultiViewHandler.java:148) >>>>> at >>>>> javax.faces.application.ViewHandlerWrapper.restoreView(ViewHandlerWrapper.java:288) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The more i dig into this, the more doubts raise, that anyone is using >>>>> trinidad2 (with facelets) really... >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Manuel. >>>>> >>>>> >>
