Manuel, Could you log a JIRA issue for this problem?
Max On 7/16/2011 9:11 PM, Manuel Hartl wrote:
Hi list, my rearch to get trinidad2 with facelets working gets more confusing.. the following was tested with mojarra 2.0.2-b10 and 2.0.6 trinidad-2.0.0 and trinidad-2.0.1-SNAPSHOT (executed von 17th of July) web.xml-parameters: <context-param> <param-name>javax.faces.DEFAULT_SUFFIX</param-name> <param-value>.xhtml</param-value> </context-param> <context-param> <param-name>javax.faces.PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING</param-name> <param-value>false</param-value> </context-param> <context-param> <param-name>javax.faces.PROJECT_STAGE</param-name> <param-value>Development</param-value> </context-param> <context-param> <param-name>javax.faces.STATE_SAVING_METHOD</param-name> <param-value>client</param-value> </context-param> <context-param> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.COMPRESS_STATE_IN_CLIENT</param-name> <param-value>true</param-value> </context-param> <context-param> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CACHE_VIEW_ROOT</param-name> <param-value>false</param-value> </context-param> <context-param> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CLIENT_STATE_METHOD</param-name> <param-value>token</param-value> </context-param> <context-param> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.DISABLE_CONTENT_COMPRESSION</param-name> <param-value>true</param-value> </context-param> <context-param> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.ENABLE_LIGHTWEIGHT_DIALOGS</param-name> <param-value>true</param-value> </context-param> <context-param> <param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.ENABLE_PPR_OPTIMIZATION</param-name> <param-value>false</param-value> </context-param> 1) the problem with tr/trh tags not rendered can be workaround by setting the renderKitId-Attribut of f:view/f:subview to "org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.core". it seems that the default-render-kit-id in the faces-config.xml is just ignored. Can someone explain this? 2) Now the first page is displayed, any following page gives the following exception. It seems this is a problem with the format of viewState stored in the hidden form field: java.io.IOException: Not in GZIP format at java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream.readHeader(GZIPInputStream.java:143) at java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream.<init>(GZIPInputStream.java:58) at java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream.<init>(GZIPInputStream.java:67) at com.sun.faces.renderkit.ClientSideStateHelper.doGetState(ClientSideStateHelper.java:231) at com.sun.faces.renderkit.ClientSideStateHelper.getState(ClientSideStateHelper.java:198) at com.sun.faces.renderkit.ResponseStateManagerImpl.getState(ResponseStateManagerImpl.java:100) at com.sun.faces.renderkit.ResponseStateManagerImpl.getTreeStructureToRestore(ResponseStateManagerImpl.java:148) at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.StateManagerImpl.restoreView(StateManagerImpl.java:584) at com.sun.faces.application.view.ViewHandlingStrategy.restoreView(ViewHandlingStrategy.java:123) at com.sun.faces.application.view.FaceletViewHandlingStrategy.restoreView(FaceletViewHandlingStrategy.java:448) at com.sun.faces.application.view.MultiViewHandler.restoreView(MultiViewHandler.java:148) at javax.faces.application.ViewHandlerWrapper.restoreView(ViewHandlerWrapper.java:288) The more i dig into this, the more doubts raise, that anyone is using trinidad2 (with facelets) really... Regards, Manuel.