Hi!
Something I did sometimes is to use an explicit request parameter combined with
<f:validateBean> :
<f:validateBean disabled="#{!empty param['check']}">
.... your stuff
and the button looks like the following:
<h:commandButton id="personAddBtn" action="#{searchForm.startSearch()}"
value="#{amsg.searchPerson}">
<f:param name="check" value="false"/>
</h:commandButton>
The reason I don't use immediate=true is that this would skip the 'update
model' step, thus I would loose all the values entered in the fields.
With my solution, it just passes the values, sets it into the model but does no
validation so far. Of course, on the 'save' button it will be validated.
Please note that this only works when you have some 'stateful' backing beans,
e.g CDI (see MyFaces CODI) @SessionScoped, @WindowScoped, @ConversationScoped
or similar Spring contexts (e.g. MyFaces Orchestra Conversations).
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Rudy De Busscher <rdebussc...@gmail.com>
> To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org>
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 12:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Skip the Validation Phase of JSF with ExtVal
>
> Hello Igor,
>
> There exists an add-on that can do that , see (1). Don't know how well it
> works with Bean validation, probably not due to the missing
> @SkipValidationSupport on bean validation annotations.
>
> Why is immediate=true not an option? The actionListener on the button is
> still executed (invoke application phase) so you can create a new empty
> instance of the entity for example.
>
> Regards
> Rudy
>
> (1)
> http://os890.blogspot.com/2009/03/myfaces-extval-add-on-bypassvalidation.html
>
> 2012/1/19 Igor Guimarães <igorcicomp...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Extval provide a way to skip of Validation Phase of processor?
>>
>> A have a button "New", that puting a new itens on my list or
> create a new
>> bean, but the property "imediate" jumping other phasses too
> (Update Model
>> Values and Invoke Application), and its not applicable for me.
>>
>> Anybody has a idea?
>>
>> I will try extends class BeanValidator for check this on method validate,
>> but I wanna do this more simple.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Igor Luiz Vieira Guimarães
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Rudy De Busscher
> http://www.c4j.be
>
