Sorry for the off topic, but if you think that your biggest bottleneck is
in your data-layer, you should give batoo jpa a try ;)

2012/11/20 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <smithh032...@gmail.com>

> Well, you and others 'sold' me onto TomEE, so here I am. If I can get this
> migration to TomEE and CDI complete, and my endusers are happy, then more
> than likely, I will remain TomEE (supporter and user) for life, and will
> not plan to return to Glassfish. :)
>
> In production, my (PrimeFaces 3.4.1) app is running so fast with Glassfish
> 3.1.2.2 and MyFaces Core 2.1.9, and JUEL (on an old Windows Server 2003
> Dell server), so I hope TomEE and CDI will beat out the performance I
> currently have in production, and I'm positive that it will...since
> OpenWebBeans is fast (like you said in one of your blogs/posts). :)
>
> Since I started using TomEE, it seems as though you all recommend HSQLDB;
> I'm currently using 'Apache' Derby and that's working great, but I saw some
> benchmark tests that OpenJPA and HSQLDB performs much better than
> OpenJPA/Derby and EclipseLink/Derby. Right now, I'm using EclipseLink. I
> may look into migrating from Derby to HSQL when I have plenty of time to do
> so, but I rather do more fun 'java' programming than SQL programming right
> now. I'm sure you can understand that. I think the biggest bottleneck in my
> app is the database and probably the machine it's running on. And trust me,
> I've read how to tune Derby for performance and I think I did all I could
> to tune my Derby database. :)
>
> Wow, interesting. Thanks for sharing that about CDI events. It's funny that
> you said that CDI events != messages. :)
>
> I need to study the CDI tutorials and blogs a bit, so I can learn how to
> use CDI events. I really would like to use it whereever
> possible/applicable. :)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> > Dropping OpenEJB as we are now back to core JSF and related. I don't want
> > to spam them ;)
> >
> > 1.): each container has pros and cons. And each of them needs different
> > workarounds in edge cases :)
> >
> >
> > 2.) I'm not using NetBeans, but it's basically the same scenario. In my
> > project I opted for only using META-INF/beans.xml and completely dropping
> > WEB-INF/beans.xml. This is perfectly fine as per the CDI spec [1].
> >
> >
> > >What is a good example or use case for using CDI events?
> >
> > Oh there are plenty! You just need to understand that CDI events !=
> > messages. CDI events are _always_ synchronous and only get delivered to
> > beans in currently active contexts.
> >
> >
> > E.g. if you fire a CDI event and have a public @SessionScoped class User
> > then only the contextual instance 'User' from the current session will
> > receive the event.
> >
> > You can think about CDI events as a method invocation where you do not
> > know on which (and how many) instances you invoke it.
> >
> >
> > A practical use case. In our application we have a big fat menu. The menu
> > content is depending on the language of the user and his privileges.
> Since
> > this can change on a language change or if the user logs in/out, etc most
> > apps always re-calculate the whole MenuItem tree from the database.
> >
> >
> > What we did in our application is the following: Menu is a @SessionScoped
> > cdi bean and we do NOT re-calculate the items for every request. Instead
> we
> > fire a UserSettingsChangedEvent on each language change and login/logout.
> > In the Menu bean (and a lot other places) we @Observes
> > UserSettingsChangedEvent and reload the menu in that case.
> >
> >
> > This performs vastly better and allows us to radically cache lots of
> > things.
> >
> >
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-218
> >
> > >________________________________
> > > From: "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <smithh032...@gmail.com>
> > >To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <
> > strub...@yahoo.de>
> > >Cc: "us...@openejb.apache.org" <us...@openejb.apache.org>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 3:56 PM
> > >Subject: Re: Migrating to CDI: @Asynchronous
> > >
> > >
> > >Mark,
> > >
> > >
> > >Cool beans and agreed about @Asynchronous! Since I read about
> > @Asynchronous on Stackoverflow.com (a post by David Blevins), I decided
> to
> > give it a try, but I think I did read that 'asynchronous' (runnable,
> > etc...) tasks are not all that good in web application.
> > >
> > >
> > >So, while you were writing your reply, I was already commenting out the
> > call to the @Asynchronous method, and I reverted to the synchronous
> version
> > of the method to update Google Calendar. After adding @Asynchronous, I
> > added some logic that works better than @Asynchronous, it will not do a
> > google calendar update on 'every' database update; I have some strategic
> > processing in place that brought the # of google calendar requests down
> by
> > hundreds and even thousands on a daily average.
> > >
> > >
> > >You know what? I attempted to add to META-INF as well as WEB-INF (some
> > days ago), and I already reported (in an earlier post) that that didn't
> > allow my web app to start in TomEE (or Glassfish, if I was still using
> > Glassfish when I reported that earlier...smile).
> > >
> > >
> > >In response to Eclipse...hopefully, no offense will be taken, i'm not a
> > user of eclipse, I've been a user of NetBeans ever since I started
> > developing JSF web application (since last summer, 2011), and I can be
> the
> > loyal type if something or someone treats me good. I was 'loyal' to
> > Mojarra, but then I heard about the Mojarra issues updating components
> via
> > AJAX, so I migrated to MyFaces Core (when I heard MyFaces Core 2.1.7+
> > performs better than Mojarra), and then reading one of your posts, Mark,
> > about OpenWebBeans performing fast, and JIRA's and many people mentioning
> > that CDI is better than JSF managed beans, I decided to migrate to CDI,
> and
> > determined to use any/all features available that is offered by CDI, like
> > events, SSE (server sent events), push (like Atmosphere), etc...
> > >
> > >
> > >Was having trouble using Atmosphere with Glassfish, so decided to give
> > TomEE a whirl, since you, Andy Bailey (a friend in PrimeFaces forum), and
> > others recommended TomEE. I like all that Glassfish 'markets' (or tries
> to
> > sell) to JSF developers, but I'm liking what I see and hear about TomEE,
> > OpenWebBeans, OpenEJB, etc...
> > >
> > >
> > >What is a good example or use case for using CDI events?
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >Howard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >Hi!
> > >>
> > >>One of my first advice is to make sure that beans.xml is really there
> > for the container.
> > >>I've seen this pretty often if someone starts the webapp directly from
> > Eclipse. In that case the CDI container sometimes cannot find
> > WEB-INF/beans.xml as eclipse doesn't set the classpath entries correctly.
> > >>
> > >>Sometimes it helps to add a META-INF/beans.xml to the webapp classpath.
> > This will end up in WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/beans.xml and is perfectly
> > fine from a spec perspective.
> > >>
> > >>There's a 30% chance that this is your problem ;)
> > >>
> > >>For the @Asynchronous:
> > >>
> > >>In general I do not really like @Asynchronous in webapps. It's really
> > very seldom useful as you need to wait for the result anyway. It also
> > doesn't get any Session, Request or Transaction information propagated
> over
> > and it's not guaranteed to succeed. Think about what happens if an
> > Exception gets hit in the asynchronous bean?
> > >>
> > >>This is really only useful in 2 cases:
> > >>* fire and forget. If you don't take care if the job succeeds or not,
> > then you might use it.
> > >>
> > >>* spawning off multiple jobs and waiting for all of them before
> > returning.
> > >>
> > >>Still you need to take a lot of care about error handling and similar
> > stuff.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>In our big application where we really need asynchronous tasks to be
> > guaranteed to get executed we went the classic route which works on the
> > Host since the 60s: we just write the job into an own 'Tasks' table and
> > process it via an own Quartz job. On success, it updates the status. On
> > error it sets the task to a failure status and adds information about the
> > cause.
> > >>That way we have a failure safe and restartable implementation.
> > >>
> > >>LieGrue,
> > >>strub
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>----- Original Message -----
> > >>> From: "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <smithh032...@gmail.com>
> > >>> To: us...@openejb.apache.org; MyFaces Discussion <
> > users@myfaces.apache.org>
> > >>> Cc:
> > >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 3:06 PM
> > >>> Subject: Re: Migrating to CDI: @Asynchronous
> > >>>
> > >>> MyFaces Users,
> > >>>
> > >>> Please read OP (or my original email below), and then read this
> email,
> > and
> > >>> advise.
> > >>>
> > >>> Romain,
> > >>>
> > >>> Yes, I have a code snippet; please continue reading beyond/below
> first
> > code
> > >>> snippet.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Below is the code that is called by multiple beans as well as the
> bean
> > >>> where this method is defined.
> > >>>
> > >>>     /*
> > >>>      * Is it safe to start a new thread in a JSF managed bean?
> > >>>      * Look at answers by BalusC and David Blevins
> > >>>      *
> > >>>
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6149919/is-it-safe-to-start-a-new-thread-in-a-jsf-managed-bean
> > >>>      *
> > >>>      * Java EE 6 Tutorial Chapter 27 Using Asynchronous Method
> > Invocation
> > >>> in Session Beans
> > >>>      * http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/tutorial/doc/gkkqg.html
> > >>>      */
> > >>>     @Asynchronous
> > >>>     public Future<Date> updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync(Date
> > >>> tripDateToBePlacedInQueue) {
> > >>>
> > >>>         String log;
> > >>>
> > >>>         Date tripDate =
> > >>>
> >
> usersController.queueDateAndOrUpdateGoogleCalendar(tripDateToBePlacedInQueue);
> > >>>         if (tripDate == null) {
> > >>>             return new AsyncResult<>(tripDate);
> > >>>         }
> > >>>
> > >>>         performingGoogleCalendarMaintenace = true;
> > >>>
> > >>>         try {
> > >>>
> > >>>             if (usersController.googleCalendarHasEvents()) {
> > >>>                 usersController.deleteEvents(tripDate, tripDate);
> > >>>             }
> > >>>
> > >>>             String tripDateFrom =
> > displayUtil.getDateFromDateTime(tripDate,
> > >>> false);
> > >>>             String tripDateTo =
> > displayUtil.getDateFromDateTime(tripDate,
> > >>> false);
> > >>>
> > >>>             List<Orders> list =
> > getFacade().findAllConfirmed(tripDateFrom,
> > >>> tripDateTo, true);
> > >>>
> > >>>             if (list != null) {
> > >>>                 for (Orders o : list) {
> > >>>
> > >>> usersController.addEventToCalendar(newGoogleCalendarEvent(o));
> > >>>                 }
> > >>>             }
> > >>>
> > >>>             log =
> > "pf_OrdersController.updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync():
> > >>> " +
> > >>>                   new DateTime(tripDate).toString("MM/dd/yyyy") +
> > >>>                   " processed successfully";
> > >>>         } catch (Exception e) {
> > >>>             e.printStackTrace();
> > >>>             messages.addFormErrorMsg("Error updating Google
> Calendar",
> > >>> (e.getMessage() != null) ? e.getMessage() : "");
> > >>>             log =
> > "pf_OrdersController.updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync():
> > >>> " +
> > >>>                   new DateTime(tripDate).toString("MM/dd/yyyy") +
> > >>>                   " processing failed due to exception";
> > >>>         } finally {
> > >>>             performingGoogleCalendarMaintenace = false;
> > >>>         }
> > >>>         System.out.println(log);
> > >>>
> > >>>         // Return our result
> > >>>         return new AsyncResult<>(tripDate);
> > >>>     }
> > >>>
> > >>> Below, is code where the @Asynchronous method is *called within the
> > same
> > >>> bean*, and is not the last piece of code in the calling method.
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>             /*
> > >>>              * 1. if tripDate changed, then update Google Calendar
> for
> > >>> original trip date
> > >>>              * 2. update Google Calendar for current trip date
> > >>>              */
> > >>>             if (new
> > >>> DateTime(current.getReportDateTime()).toString("MM/dd/yyyy").equals(
> > >>>                  new
> > >>> DateTime(tripDateBeforeEdit).toString("MM/dd/yyyy"))
> > >>> == false) {
> > >>>
> updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync(tripDateBeforeEdit);
> > >>>             }
> > >>>
> > updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync(current.getReportDateTime());
> > >>>         }
> > >>>         if (invokePrepareEdit)
> > >>>             return prepareEdit();
> > >>>         else
> > >>>             return null;
> > >>>
> > >>> Below, is code that is at the very end of a calling method and
> *called
> > >>> within the same bean*, so there are no concerns here.
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>             /*
> > >>>              * update Google Calendar for current trip date
> > >>>              */
> > >>>
> > updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync(current.getReportDateTime());
> > >>>             return returnToBrowseOrView();
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Below, is code that was *added to another bean*, that will call the
> > >>> *@Asynchronous
> > >>> method defined on the other bean* (ordersController).
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>     public void updateGoogleCalendar() {
> > >>>         if (relatedEntityName.equals("orders")) {
> > >>>             Orders order = (Orders) relatedEntityObj;
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> ordersController.updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync(order.getTripDateTime());
> > >>>         }
> > >>>     }
> > >>>
> > >>> The method above, updateGoogleCalendar(), is called by code similar
> to
> > >>> below, which is not the last code executed in calling method.
> > >>>
> > >>>             if (relatedEntityName.equals("orders")) {
> > >>>                 auditTrailDesc = "Updated ORDER: updated ORIGIN" +
> > >>>                                  (originTx != null &&
> originTx.length()
> > >>>>  0
> > >>> ? "(" + originTx + ")" : "");
> > >>>
> > >>> auditTrailController.createFromRelatedEntity(relatedEntityName,
> > >>> relatedEntityObj, auditTrailDesc);
> > >>>                 *// update Google Calendar*
> > >>>                 *updateGoogleCalendar();*
> > >>
> > >>>             }
> > >>>             else if (relatedEntityName.equals("orderDriver")) {
> > >>>                 OrderDriver od = (OrderDriver) relatedEntityObj;
> > >>>                 OrderCostDetails orderCostDetails =
> > >>> od.getOrderCostDetails();
> > >>>                 Orders order = new
> > >>> ArrayList<>(orderCostDetails.getOrders()).get(0);
> > >>>                 auditTrailDesc = "updated ORIGIN" +
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Howard
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>> <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>>  Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  can you share any snippet of code?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > >>>>  *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > >>>>  *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > >>>>  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > >>>>  *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > >>>>  *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  2012/11/20 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <smithh032...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  > Prior to migrating from JSF managed to CDI (and currently in
> > >>> production),
> > >>>>  > my web app is using @Asynchronous on @SessionScoped bean to push
> > data
> > >>> to
> > >>>>  > and keep Google Calendar updated with specific data from the
> > database.
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>  > Honestly, I don't think I coded it correctly. What I mean by
> that,
> > >>> I
> > >>>>  don't
> > >>>>  > think I'm handling or capturing the return value of @Asynchronous
> > >>>>  methods,
> > >>>>  > and honestly, I don't know where execution is ending after some
> or
> > >>> most
> > >>>>  of
> > >>>>  > the calls to @Asynchronous methods.
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>  > Currently, in production, the @Asynchronous method calls seem to
> be
> > >>>>  working
> > >>>>  > fine (production = MyFaces Core 2.1.9, JSF managed beans,
> Glassfish
> > >>>>  > 3.1.2.2). Now that I'm migrating to TomEE/CDI, it seems as though
> > >>>>  > @Asynchronous is breaking my app; of course, I don't mind
> > >>> accepting
> > >>>>  > responsibility and calling it a developer error. @Asynchronous
> > seems
> > >>> to
> > >>>>  > result with the following error:
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>  > Target Unreachable, identifier resolved to null
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>  > I've read the following:
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2010/03/05/jee-cdi-tip-target-unreachable-identifier-resolved-to-null/
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4845041/target-unreachable-identifier-resolved-to-null
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>  > but I have an empty beans.xml in WEB-INF and I have no JARs of my
> > own
> > >>> (so
> > >>>>  > no need to add beans.xml to META-INF, and please note, a lot of
> the
> > >>> xhtml
> > >>>>  > pages in the app are working as designed. Also, I read something
> > about
> > >>>>  > cyclic references (below)
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>  > "injection points in one bean deployment archive cannot be
> > >>> satisfied by a
> > >>>>  > bean in a separate bean archive, even when they are from
> libraries
> > in
> > >>> the
> > >>>>  > same module (web
> > >>>>  > archive)"<
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://java.net/jira/browse/GLASSFISH-15721?focusedCommentId=301147&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_301147
> > >>>>  > >
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>  > but I'm sure that is not the cause of the error that I'm
> > >>> experiencing.
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>  > So, would you all recommend me to consider CDI Events instead of
> > >>>>  > @Asynchronous, both, or should I just fix @Asynchronous to work
> in
> > the
> > >>>>  CDI
> > >>>>  > app?
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>  > Thanks,
> > >>>>  > Howard
> > >>>>  >
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to