Thomas,

I'm trying to use batoo-jpa now, but the dependencies include transaction
JAR that may be 'ignored' by TomEE container. Everytime I start TomEE (or
deploy to app from NetBeans 7.2), the following shows up in my server log:


Nov 20, 2012 11:44:43 AM org.apache.tomee.catalina.TomEEClassLoaderEnricher
validateJarFile
WARNING: jar
'C:\Users\Public\NetBeansProjects\mcms\build\web\WEB-INF\lib\transaction-api-1.1.jar'
contains offending class: javax.transaction.Transaction. It will be ignored.

Also, there are so many dependencies for batoo-jpa. Still trying...


On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry for the off topic, but if you think that your biggest bottleneck is
> in your data-layer, you should give batoo jpa a try ;)
>
> 2012/11/20 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <smithh032...@gmail.com>
>
> > Well, you and others 'sold' me onto TomEE, so here I am. If I can get
> this
> > migration to TomEE and CDI complete, and my endusers are happy, then more
> > than likely, I will remain TomEE (supporter and user) for life, and will
> > not plan to return to Glassfish. :)
> >
> > In production, my (PrimeFaces 3.4.1) app is running so fast with
> Glassfish
> > 3.1.2.2 and MyFaces Core 2.1.9, and JUEL (on an old Windows Server 2003
> > Dell server), so I hope TomEE and CDI will beat out the performance I
> > currently have in production, and I'm positive that it will...since
> > OpenWebBeans is fast (like you said in one of your blogs/posts). :)
> >
> > Since I started using TomEE, it seems as though you all recommend HSQLDB;
> > I'm currently using 'Apache' Derby and that's working great, but I saw
> some
> > benchmark tests that OpenJPA and HSQLDB performs much better than
> > OpenJPA/Derby and EclipseLink/Derby. Right now, I'm using EclipseLink. I
> > may look into migrating from Derby to HSQL when I have plenty of time to
> do
> > so, but I rather do more fun 'java' programming than SQL programming
> right
> > now. I'm sure you can understand that. I think the biggest bottleneck in
> my
> > app is the database and probably the machine it's running on. And trust
> me,
> > I've read how to tune Derby for performance and I think I did all I could
> > to tune my Derby database. :)
> >
> > Wow, interesting. Thanks for sharing that about CDI events. It's funny
> that
> > you said that CDI events != messages. :)
> >
> > I need to study the CDI tutorials and blogs a bit, so I can learn how to
> > use CDI events. I really would like to use it whereever
> > possible/applicable. :)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Dropping OpenEJB as we are now back to core JSF and related. I don't
> want
> > > to spam them ;)
> > >
> > > 1.): each container has pros and cons. And each of them needs different
> > > workarounds in edge cases :)
> > >
> > >
> > > 2.) I'm not using NetBeans, but it's basically the same scenario. In my
> > > project I opted for only using META-INF/beans.xml and completely
> dropping
> > > WEB-INF/beans.xml. This is perfectly fine as per the CDI spec [1].
> > >
> > >
> > > >What is a good example or use case for using CDI events?
> > >
> > > Oh there are plenty! You just need to understand that CDI events !=
> > > messages. CDI events are _always_ synchronous and only get delivered to
> > > beans in currently active contexts.
> > >
> > >
> > > E.g. if you fire a CDI event and have a public @SessionScoped class
> User
> > > then only the contextual instance 'User' from the current session will
> > > receive the event.
> > >
> > > You can think about CDI events as a method invocation where you do not
> > > know on which (and how many) instances you invoke it.
> > >
> > >
> > > A practical use case. In our application we have a big fat menu. The
> menu
> > > content is depending on the language of the user and his privileges.
> > Since
> > > this can change on a language change or if the user logs in/out, etc
> most
> > > apps always re-calculate the whole MenuItem tree from the database.
> > >
> > >
> > > What we did in our application is the following: Menu is a
> @SessionScoped
> > > cdi bean and we do NOT re-calculate the items for every request.
> Instead
> > we
> > > fire a UserSettingsChangedEvent on each language change and
> login/logout.
> > > In the Menu bean (and a lot other places) we @Observes
> > > UserSettingsChangedEvent and reload the menu in that case.
> > >
> > >
> > > This performs vastly better and allows us to radically cache lots of
> > > things.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-218
> > >
> > > >________________________________
> > > > From: "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <smithh032...@gmail.com>
> > > >To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <
> > > strub...@yahoo.de>
> > > >Cc: "us...@openejb.apache.org" <us...@openejb.apache.org>
> > > >Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 3:56 PM
> > > >Subject: Re: Migrating to CDI: @Asynchronous
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Mark,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Cool beans and agreed about @Asynchronous! Since I read about
> > > @Asynchronous on Stackoverflow.com (a post by David Blevins), I decided
> > to
> > > give it a try, but I think I did read that 'asynchronous' (runnable,
> > > etc...) tasks are not all that good in web application.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >So, while you were writing your reply, I was already commenting out
> the
> > > call to the @Asynchronous method, and I reverted to the synchronous
> > version
> > > of the method to update Google Calendar. After adding @Asynchronous, I
> > > added some logic that works better than @Asynchronous, it will not do a
> > > google calendar update on 'every' database update; I have some
> strategic
> > > processing in place that brought the # of google calendar requests down
> > by
> > > hundreds and even thousands on a daily average.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >You know what? I attempted to add to META-INF as well as WEB-INF (some
> > > days ago), and I already reported (in an earlier post) that that didn't
> > > allow my web app to start in TomEE (or Glassfish, if I was still using
> > > Glassfish when I reported that earlier...smile).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >In response to Eclipse...hopefully, no offense will be taken, i'm not
> a
> > > user of eclipse, I've been a user of NetBeans ever since I started
> > > developing JSF web application (since last summer, 2011), and I can be
> > the
> > > loyal type if something or someone treats me good. I was 'loyal' to
> > > Mojarra, but then I heard about the Mojarra issues updating components
> > via
> > > AJAX, so I migrated to MyFaces Core (when I heard MyFaces Core 2.1.7+
> > > performs better than Mojarra), and then reading one of your posts,
> Mark,
> > > about OpenWebBeans performing fast, and JIRA's and many people
> mentioning
> > > that CDI is better than JSF managed beans, I decided to migrate to CDI,
> > and
> > > determined to use any/all features available that is offered by CDI,
> like
> > > events, SSE (server sent events), push (like Atmosphere), etc...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Was having trouble using Atmosphere with Glassfish, so decided to give
> > > TomEE a whirl, since you, Andy Bailey (a friend in PrimeFaces forum),
> and
> > > others recommended TomEE. I like all that Glassfish 'markets' (or tries
> > to
> > > sell) to JSF developers, but I'm liking what I see and hear about
> TomEE,
> > > OpenWebBeans, OpenEJB, etc...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >What is a good example or use case for using CDI events?
> > > >
> > > >Thanks,
> > > >Howard
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Hi!
> > > >>
> > > >>One of my first advice is to make sure that beans.xml is really there
> > > for the container.
> > > >>I've seen this pretty often if someone starts the webapp directly
> from
> > > Eclipse. In that case the CDI container sometimes cannot find
> > > WEB-INF/beans.xml as eclipse doesn't set the classpath entries
> correctly.
> > > >>
> > > >>Sometimes it helps to add a META-INF/beans.xml to the webapp
> classpath.
> > > This will end up in WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/beans.xml and is perfectly
> > > fine from a spec perspective.
> > > >>
> > > >>There's a 30% chance that this is your problem ;)
> > > >>
> > > >>For the @Asynchronous:
> > > >>
> > > >>In general I do not really like @Asynchronous in webapps. It's really
> > > very seldom useful as you need to wait for the result anyway. It also
> > > doesn't get any Session, Request or Transaction information propagated
> > over
> > > and it's not guaranteed to succeed. Think about what happens if an
> > > Exception gets hit in the asynchronous bean?
> > > >>
> > > >>This is really only useful in 2 cases:
> > > >>* fire and forget. If you don't take care if the job succeeds or not,
> > > then you might use it.
> > > >>
> > > >>* spawning off multiple jobs and waiting for all of them before
> > > returning.
> > > >>
> > > >>Still you need to take a lot of care about error handling and similar
> > > stuff.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>In our big application where we really need asynchronous tasks to be
> > > guaranteed to get executed we went the classic route which works on the
> > > Host since the 60s: we just write the job into an own 'Tasks' table and
> > > process it via an own Quartz job. On success, it updates the status. On
> > > error it sets the task to a failure status and adds information about
> the
> > > cause.
> > > >>That way we have a failure safe and restartable implementation.
> > > >>
> > > >>LieGrue,
> > > >>strub
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>----- Original Message -----
> > > >>> From: "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <smithh032...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> To: us...@openejb.apache.org; MyFaces Discussion <
> > > users@myfaces.apache.org>
> > > >>> Cc:
> > > >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 3:06 PM
> > > >>> Subject: Re: Migrating to CDI: @Asynchronous
> > > >>>
> > > >>> MyFaces Users,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Please read OP (or my original email below), and then read this
> > email,
> > > and
> > > >>> advise.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Romain,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Yes, I have a code snippet; please continue reading beyond/below
> > first
> > > code
> > > >>> snippet.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Below is the code that is called by multiple beans as well as the
> > bean
> > > >>> where this method is defined.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>     /*
> > > >>>      * Is it safe to start a new thread in a JSF managed bean?
> > > >>>      * Look at answers by BalusC and David Blevins
> > > >>>      *
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6149919/is-it-safe-to-start-a-new-thread-in-a-jsf-managed-bean
> > > >>>      *
> > > >>>      * Java EE 6 Tutorial Chapter 27 Using Asynchronous Method
> > > Invocation
> > > >>> in Session Beans
> > > >>>      * http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/6/tutorial/doc/gkkqg.html
> > > >>>      */
> > > >>>     @Asynchronous
> > > >>>     public Future<Date> updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync(Date
> > > >>> tripDateToBePlacedInQueue) {
> > > >>>
> > > >>>         String log;
> > > >>>
> > > >>>         Date tripDate =
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> usersController.queueDateAndOrUpdateGoogleCalendar(tripDateToBePlacedInQueue);
> > > >>>         if (tripDate == null) {
> > > >>>             return new AsyncResult<>(tripDate);
> > > >>>         }
> > > >>>
> > > >>>         performingGoogleCalendarMaintenace = true;
> > > >>>
> > > >>>         try {
> > > >>>
> > > >>>             if (usersController.googleCalendarHasEvents()) {
> > > >>>                 usersController.deleteEvents(tripDate, tripDate);
> > > >>>             }
> > > >>>
> > > >>>             String tripDateFrom =
> > > displayUtil.getDateFromDateTime(tripDate,
> > > >>> false);
> > > >>>             String tripDateTo =
> > > displayUtil.getDateFromDateTime(tripDate,
> > > >>> false);
> > > >>>
> > > >>>             List<Orders> list =
> > > getFacade().findAllConfirmed(tripDateFrom,
> > > >>> tripDateTo, true);
> > > >>>
> > > >>>             if (list != null) {
> > > >>>                 for (Orders o : list) {
> > > >>>
> > > >>> usersController.addEventToCalendar(newGoogleCalendarEvent(o));
> > > >>>                 }
> > > >>>             }
> > > >>>
> > > >>>             log =
> > > "pf_OrdersController.updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync():
> > > >>> " +
> > > >>>                   new DateTime(tripDate).toString("MM/dd/yyyy") +
> > > >>>                   " processed successfully";
> > > >>>         } catch (Exception e) {
> > > >>>             e.printStackTrace();
> > > >>>             messages.addFormErrorMsg("Error updating Google
> > Calendar",
> > > >>> (e.getMessage() != null) ? e.getMessage() : "");
> > > >>>             log =
> > > "pf_OrdersController.updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync():
> > > >>> " +
> > > >>>                   new DateTime(tripDate).toString("MM/dd/yyyy") +
> > > >>>                   " processing failed due to exception";
> > > >>>         } finally {
> > > >>>             performingGoogleCalendarMaintenace = false;
> > > >>>         }
> > > >>>         System.out.println(log);
> > > >>>
> > > >>>         // Return our result
> > > >>>         return new AsyncResult<>(tripDate);
> > > >>>     }
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Below, is code where the @Asynchronous method is *called within the
> > > same
> > > >>> bean*, and is not the last piece of code in the calling method.
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>             /*
> > > >>>              * 1. if tripDate changed, then update Google Calendar
> > for
> > > >>> original trip date
> > > >>>              * 2. update Google Calendar for current trip date
> > > >>>              */
> > > >>>             if (new
> > > >>>
> DateTime(current.getReportDateTime()).toString("MM/dd/yyyy").equals(
> > > >>>                  new
> > > >>> DateTime(tripDateBeforeEdit).toString("MM/dd/yyyy"))
> > > >>> == false) {
> > > >>>
> > updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync(tripDateBeforeEdit);
> > > >>>             }
> > > >>>
> > > updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync(current.getReportDateTime());
> > > >>>         }
> > > >>>         if (invokePrepareEdit)
> > > >>>             return prepareEdit();
> > > >>>         else
> > > >>>             return null;
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Below, is code that is at the very end of a calling method and
> > *called
> > > >>> within the same bean*, so there are no concerns here.
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>             /*
> > > >>>              * update Google Calendar for current trip date
> > > >>>              */
> > > >>>
> > > updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync(current.getReportDateTime());
> > > >>>             return returnToBrowseOrView();
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Below, is code that was *added to another bean*, that will call the
> > > >>> *@Asynchronous
> > > >>> method defined on the other bean* (ordersController).
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>     public void updateGoogleCalendar() {
> > > >>>         if (relatedEntityName.equals("orders")) {
> > > >>>             Orders order = (Orders) relatedEntityObj;
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> ordersController.updateGoogleCalendarPostEditAsync(order.getTripDateTime());
> > > >>>         }
> > > >>>     }
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The method above, updateGoogleCalendar(), is called by code similar
> > to
> > > >>> below, which is not the last code executed in calling method.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>             if (relatedEntityName.equals("orders")) {
> > > >>>                 auditTrailDesc = "Updated ORDER: updated ORIGIN" +
> > > >>>                                  (originTx != null &&
> > originTx.length()
> > > >>>>  0
> > > >>> ? "(" + originTx + ")" : "");
> > > >>>
> > > >>> auditTrailController.createFromRelatedEntity(relatedEntityName,
> > > >>> relatedEntityObj, auditTrailDesc);
> > > >>>                 *// update Google Calendar*
> > > >>>                 *updateGoogleCalendar();*
> > > >>
> > > >>>             }
> > > >>>             else if (relatedEntityName.equals("orderDriver")) {
> > > >>>                 OrderDriver od = (OrderDriver) relatedEntityObj;
> > > >>>                 OrderCostDetails orderCostDetails =
> > > >>> od.getOrderCostDetails();
> > > >>>                 Orders order = new
> > > >>> ArrayList<>(orderCostDetails.getOrders()).get(0);
> > > >>>                 auditTrailDesc = "updated ORIGIN" +
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Howard
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > >>> <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>  Hi,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>  can you share any snippet of code?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>  *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > >>>>  *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > >>>>  *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > >>>>  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > >>>>  *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > >>>>  *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>  2012/11/20 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <smithh032...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>  > Prior to migrating from JSF managed to CDI (and currently in
> > > >>> production),
> > > >>>>  > my web app is using @Asynchronous on @SessionScoped bean to
> push
> > > data
> > > >>> to
> > > >>>>  > and keep Google Calendar updated with specific data from the
> > > database.
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>  > Honestly, I don't think I coded it correctly. What I mean by
> > that,
> > > >>> I
> > > >>>>  don't
> > > >>>>  > think I'm handling or capturing the return value of
> @Asynchronous
> > > >>>>  methods,
> > > >>>>  > and honestly, I don't know where execution is ending after some
> > or
> > > >>> most
> > > >>>>  of
> > > >>>>  > the calls to @Asynchronous methods.
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>  > Currently, in production, the @Asynchronous method calls seem
> to
> > be
> > > >>>>  working
> > > >>>>  > fine (production = MyFaces Core 2.1.9, JSF managed beans,
> > Glassfish
> > > >>>>  > 3.1.2.2). Now that I'm migrating to TomEE/CDI, it seems as
> though
> > > >>>>  > @Asynchronous is breaking my app; of course, I don't mind
> > > >>> accepting
> > > >>>>  > responsibility and calling it a developer error. @Asynchronous
> > > seems
> > > >>> to
> > > >>>>  > result with the following error:
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>  > Target Unreachable, identifier resolved to null
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>  > I've read the following:
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2010/03/05/jee-cdi-tip-target-unreachable-identifier-resolved-to-null/
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4845041/target-unreachable-identifier-resolved-to-null
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>  > but I have an empty beans.xml in WEB-INF and I have no JARs of
> my
> > > own
> > > >>> (so
> > > >>>>  > no need to add beans.xml to META-INF, and please note, a lot of
> > the
> > > >>> xhtml
> > > >>>>  > pages in the app are working as designed. Also, I read
> something
> > > about
> > > >>>>  > cyclic references (below)
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>  > "injection points in one bean deployment archive cannot be
> > > >>> satisfied by a
> > > >>>>  > bean in a separate bean archive, even when they are from
> > libraries
> > > in
> > > >>> the
> > > >>>>  > same module (web
> > > >>>>  > archive)"<
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > >
> >
> http://java.net/jira/browse/GLASSFISH-15721?focusedCommentId=301147&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_301147
> > > >>>>  > >
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>  > but I'm sure that is not the cause of the error that I'm
> > > >>> experiencing.
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>  > So, would you all recommend me to consider CDI Events instead
> of
> > > >>>>  > @Asynchronous, both, or should I just fix @Asynchronous to work
> > in
> > > the
> > > >>>>  CDI
> > > >>>>  > app?
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>  > Thanks,
> > > >>>>  > Howard
> > > >>>>  >
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to