Great, thanks Mark, glad to hear that! Caches? Care to share a blog that 'you' possibly wrote on that, or anyone else? :)
I did read about Second-Level caching in Java EE 6 tutorial, but was not a big priority when I reviewed that before I began developing JSF web app last year. :) On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > well, that should do :) > > We are serving up to 40.000 users with now 5GB RAM. But mostly due to lots > of caches in our app. > Oh and we have 16 webapps. Each user getting their own session in each > webapp... > > So really nothing to worry about. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Howard W. Smith, Jr." <smithh032...@gmail.com> > > To: MyFaces Discussion <users@myfaces.apache.org> > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:29 AM > > Subject: Re: Migration to TomEE/CDI complete, regression testing, > ViewAccessScoped > > > >T he most users that will be using the app concurrently is 4 to 5 users > (my > > family), and there are times that they are doing some 'heavy lifting' > > (database retrievals/updates, as well as PDF files generated in memory > and > > printed/viewed/emailed/faxed, and occasional data push to Google Calendar > > via Google Calendar API). Next, planning to automatically insert data > into > > database from public website's form results. Hoping to expand the > services > > of the 'app' to customers via the public website...one day. > > > > The (JSF/HTML5) web app is accessed in and out of the office on multiple > > platforms (laptops, iPad, multiple Android devices). > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Thomas Andraschko < > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Can i ask you how much users serves your app? > >> Currently our app takes only 20mb session size with 200 (or 100, can't > >> remember exactly) concurrent users and we don't use that much > >> View(Access)Scoped beans. > >> > >> 2012/11/21 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <smithh032...@gmail.com> > >> > >> > Thomas, > >> > > >> > Well, for now, I opt to do/use CDI @RequestScoped, ASAP, since > > production > >> > box/server is running Windows 2003 Server, where 4GB RAM is > > max...shaking > >> > my head. I'm sure we will upgrade when necessary, but right now > > that app > >> is > >> > lighting fast now with Glassfish 3.1.2.2 and MyFaces Core 2.1.9 and > > JUEL > >> > 2.2.5. :) > >> > > >> > Looking forward to the performance advantages/gains of OpenWebBeans. > > :) > >> > > >> > Also, this Batoo JPA that you mentioned earlier, because > >> EclipseLink/Derby > >> > and Google Calendar requests/updates are the only 2 bottlenecks in > the > >> app. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Howard > >> > > >> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Thomas Andraschko < > >> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Howard, there is nothing against ViewScoped/ViewAccessScoped. > >> > > But many data in ViewScoped/ViewAccessScoped leads to high memory > >> usage, > >> > so > >> > > it's better to use RequestScoped if possible. > >> > > > >> > > 2012/11/21 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <smithh032...@gmail.com> > >> > > > >> > > > I'd like to take time to thank you all that helped me > > migrate from > >> > > > Glassfish 3.1.2.2 and JSF Managed beans to TomEE and CDI > > managed > >> > beans. I > >> > > > think the migration is complete. I am in regression testing > >> phase/mode > >> > > now. > >> > > > :) > >> > > > > >> > > > Special shout out to Thomas Andraschko, as his inputs in > > PrimeFaces > >> > > forums > >> > > > and blogs, lead/motivated me to migrate from Mojarra 2.1.7 > > to MyFaces > >> > > Core > >> > > > 2.1.8 for fast (AJAX) rendering performance, and then he > > even > >> > recommended > >> > > > MyFaces Core, OpenWebBeans, JUEL for huge performance gains, > > and even > >> > > > today, he encouraged me to consider Batoo JPA, and because > > of that, > >> > > > TomEE/OpenEJB and Batoo JPA are now discussing integration! > > :) > >> > > > > >> > > > Anyway, Jose, here, recommended CODI @ViewAccessScoped. I > > think > >> Thomas > >> > > and > >> > > > some other expert users in PrimeFaces Core forum recommended > >> > > @RequestScoped > >> > > > as much as possible throughout app, and recommended against > > JSF > >> > > @ViewScoped > >> > > > as well as CODI @ViewAccessScoped (I hope I'm not > > misquoting > >> > > them...smile). > >> > > > > >> > > > Honestly, I have no CDI @RequestScoped beans in my app; I > > need to > >> take > >> > > time > >> > > > to move some of my code from CDI @SessionScoped to CDI > >> @RequestScoped. > >> > > > Also, due to issues I experienced injecting EJBs inside of > >> > > @FacesConverter > >> > > > (which were added to CDI @SessionScoped beans) caused me to > > move all > >> my > >> > > > @FacesConverter classes to JSF @RequestScoped beans; that > > seems to be > >> > > > working great, but Mark and Gerhard has already recommended > > CODI > >> > > > @Advanced/etc... to inject beans in @FacesConverter classes. > > I need > >> to > >> > > give > >> > > > them a try even though I spent hours moving @FacesConverter > > classes > >> > from > >> > > > CDI beans to JSF Managed beans...during this migration to > > CDI. > >> > > > > >> > > > So, please advise on whether I should use @ViewAccessScoped; > > pros, > >> > cons, > >> > > > promote/hinder performance, etc... > >> > > > > >> > > > OR, should I move to CDI @RequestScoped, ASAP??? :) > >> > > > > >> > > > Oh, Romain informed me that tomee.xml JDBC resources > > automatically > >> have > >> > > > pooling. I hope that is the case, because as soon as > > regression > >> testing > >> > > is > >> > > > complete, I would like to push the new CDI version of my JSF > > web app > >> to > >> > > > production, and start using some of the other/neat features > > of CDI, > >> > like > >> > > > CDI events where possible. :) > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > > > Howard > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
