wow, okay. :)

Earlier, Leonardo Uribe mentioned the following:

I can confirm a simple example using MyFaces 2.2.0 works. See:

http://jsflive.wordpress.com/2013/04/23/jsf22-file-upload/

Looking forward to hearing why your/Karl's test case does not work.



On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Karl Kildén <karl.kil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Removing deltaspike has no effect. / Karl
>
>
> On 4 March 2014 16:23, Howard W. Smith, Jr. <smithh032...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Have you reported this to Deltaspike? I wonder what happens when you
> > 'remove' delta spike from the equation/mix, and see if stuff/stack starts
> > working. :)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Karl Kildén <karl.kil...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > It made no difference for me / Karl
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4 March 2014 15:52, Karl Kildén <karl.kil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Nice spot, In my production environment I changed it but I will test
> > that
> > > > aspect in the template project
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4 March 2014 15:50, Howard W. Smith, Jr. <smithh032...@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Karl Kildén <karl.kil...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Everyone, this is how I reproduced it in a test project:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >    - Cloned Gerhards template
> > > >> > project:https://github.com/os890/javaweb-cdi-ds-project-template
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> hmmmm,
> > > >>
> > > >> examining the faces-config.xml, i see 2.0 specified instead of 2.1
> (or
> > > >> 2.2).
> > > >>
> > > >> <faces-config version="2.0"
> > > >>     xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee";
> > > >>     xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";
> > > >>     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
> > > >>     xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
> > > >> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-facesconfig_2_0.xsd";>
> > > >>
> > > >> </faces-config>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> When MyFaces 2.2 was released, i don't think I saw any mention of a
> > > >> 'requirement' to update faces-config, accordingly, but it would be
> > nice
> > > to
> > > >> know if faces-config.xml has to be updated with '2.2' or 2.1.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to