Thanks Aldrin. My question was based off informal discussions and to a point a bit of doubt on my end regarding processor availability and minifi, then I stumbled on some other email threads too. That's why I asked about C++ version makes sense that it would have limitations since they have to get written.
But minifi as a whole could be getting misunderstood in that only certain processors work using it. But what am getting is that a good rule of thumb is minifi JAVA I should expect same functionality given what I put on the flow. minif c++ will have more limitations given the processors written for it. Thanks for the contributions! On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:37 PM Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Juan, > > We need to have this documented in terms of the core NiFi library versions > used in MiNiFi Java. The general contract is that we can support > extensions in the same manner that the framework libraries of NiFi does. > This had a few hurdles which will be resolved with MINIFI-408 [1]. I'll > create an issue to make sure we get this in docs somewhere. To this end, > yes, NiFi extensions should work within MiNiFi Java. To your point, yes > there has been a correlation between minor version of MiNiFi Java and NiFi, > but these coincidental releases will likely change with MiNiFi 0.3.0. > > MiNiFi C++ is a wholly distinct and separate endeavor. While we aim to > support the same YAML config schema there have thus far been neither been > any guarantees about the same components being available in MiNiFi C++ nor > does it necessarily to support certain functionality given the inherent > scope of the C++ codebase. With some of the recent contributions, MiNiFi > C++ has several components that are not present in any of the Java > variations of NiFi efforts. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-408 > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Juan Sequeiros <helloj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Based on previous comment "I think it may need to line up with the >> version of NiFi that MiNiFi >> 0.2.1 is based on, which is NiFi 1.2.0" >> >> What is a quick way of knowing what version of NIFI that MINIFI was built >> on? >> >> And with knowing that, is it a good assumption that the processors found >> on that NIFI will work with the MINIFI? >> How about the C++ release does the same apply? >> >> Thank you >> >> >> >
