For the PR...

If only I would have enough time for that ;)
Soon it will be end  year holidays, may be...



Le mer. 20 nov. 2019 à 16:28, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Yeah filing a JIRA would be good.  Contributing a PR for it would be even
> better.  It should have no impact on the schema registry controller
> service.  This is different.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:26 AM Etienne Jouvin <lapinoujou...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes it would be a ControllerService as you described.
>>
>> There is currently three implementation :
>> * AvroSchemaRegistry
>> * ConfluentSchemaRegistry
>> * HortonworksSchemaRegistry
>>
>> It could be based on something like them.
>>
>> May be I should send something on Jira or somewhere else to submit the
>> idea to NiFi developers ?
>>
>> But it also means that the processor JoltTransformJSON and
>> JoltTransformRecord should be changed.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Le mer. 20 nov. 2019 à 16:08, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> Is the idea to have a place to store Jolt specifications that you could
>>> then access in various components?
>>>
>>> If so a simple ControllerService such as 'JoltSpecControllerService'
>>> which has a list of keys (names of specs) and values (the spec) would
>>> probably do the trick.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:04 AM Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think that is a great idea, I’d suggest the same thing for protobuf
>>>> specs as well.
>>>>
>>>> Even if the first step is the registry supporting raw bytes access and
>>>> support….
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On November 20, 2019 at 09:28:23, Etienne Jouvin (
>>>> lapinoujou...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello all.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For reader and writers, there is the possibility to store the schema
>>>> inside a schema registry.
>>>> What do you think about having this type of mechanism for
>>>> JolftTransformation ?
>>>> Currently, I can put Jolt specification in variables and get them from
>>>> it, but I think it could be nice tohave same as schema registry.
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>> Etienne Jouvin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to