Forgive my ignorance... Is there an established place to download binary snapshots or do you mean an output of Maven via checking out a snapshot from the repository?

On another note: There is a download.html and a downloads.html(note the s) on the website. I confused myself for a few seconds when I mistyped the url.

Thanks,
Casey

On Nov 6, 2007, at 11:21 PM, David Blevins wrote:


On Nov 2, 2007, at 12:52 PM, David Blevins wrote:

On Nov 2, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Casey Rayman wrote:

We are using the <local-jndi-name> tags to force a JNDI name in our weblogic-ejb-jar.xml file. Openejb appears to allow the same tag in the openejb-jar.xml, but seems to ignore it completely.

We don't quite have the same tag in the openejb-jar.xml. You've hit upon one of the only remaining todos, let me see if i can hack something up for you. Ideally we should support your weblogic-ejb- jar.xml directly so you don't have to maintain an openejb-jar.xml file.

Ok, I've added the support we've been needing for per ejb jndi names:

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-253

Note that you can still use a template if you like, i.e. "ejb/ org.superbiz.Foo" works or you can just "ejb/{interfaceClass}".

Then I also hooked up support for pulling the jndi names out of the weblogic-ejb-jar.xml file also, so you really don't need to bother with an openejb-jar.xml. The wls conversion code so far only supports <jndi-name> and <local-jndi-name>. It'll take a bit to add cmp conversion (we use JPA for our CMP), but by the looks of the entity you posted, it should work fine as-is because the field names match the column names which is JPA default.

Back on the subject of JNDI names, do you happen to know the jndi format WebLogic uses for EJB 3 business interfaces? I poked around but didn't find anything definitive, got the impression they were just using interface name. I'd like to adjust the default template appropriately to match.

New snapshots have been published. Just switch your dependency version to 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT, give it a try and let us know if it works.

-David


Reply via email to