On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:20 PM, uglything wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
On Jun 18, 2008, at 12:53 AM, uglything wrote:
You're the man !
Muchas gracias! Or if my suspicions are correct. Maraming salamat!
If I don't get things wrong, Maraming salamat is a philippines'
expression,
right ?
Well, I'm a spanish man in france, as Police would say.
Si, es filipino. Muchos de ellos tienen nombres espanoles, entonces
nunca sabes :) Tenemos un committer en el projecto con el apellido
"Cabrera" y su padre es filipino, entonces sospeche que tu tambien eras.
Bienvenidos en qualquier forma :)
-David
David Blevins wrote:
I just have to not use the injection annotations in my servlets and
launchers,
but everything else works as expected.
We definitely plan to get a Jetty integration in there that has all
the same quality of service that we offer with Tomcat. It's good to
know you'd be interested in that kind of functionality as it helps us
prioritize.
Then, for the record, I'm very interested in a Jetty integration.
That could be time saving for me as I develop with Maven2 + Eclipse
and Jetty is the logical choice for testing in such environment.
David Blevins wrote:
I also tryed a JUnit launch on both my synthetic test application
and my
real application and everything works.
(my synthetic application is described in
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=17628307&framed=y this
post
and
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=17666227&framed=y this
other
post
The naming changes for the sake of readibility, but the underlaying
application is the same.
)
Thanks a million again. I'm still quite new on the OpenEJB forums
but I'm
**truly amazed** by your quickness at adressing the problems.
Thanks. Part of the secret of OpenEJB is that we try very hard to
keep the code "lean" and free from needless architecture and over
abstraction. It has a very direct impact on how fast we can turn
things around as there is usually very little standing in our way.
That seems to be a good choice... I think I 'll try to be more
pragmatic my
own.
I realize now that I am probabily "over concepting" my applications.
I'll take a thourough look at your code and try to learn some coding
philosophy :working:
David Blevins wrote:
And very seriously, we do appreciate the questions. As well if you
have any "wouldn't it be neat if..." types of ideas, definitely let
us
know. Small or big, we'll take em all. Dare to dream :)
-David
I'll sleep more then, and keep you guys posted with the outcomes :-)
Thanks again !
Regards,
Juan Manuel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Eclipse-Multiple-Projects-and-Missing-persistence.xml-tp16391627p17998053.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
