On 21 September 2011 02:40, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I assume that the guys are more focussed on the 4.0.0 release ATM and >>> don't really get around to 3.2.0. >> >> Yes, that is my impression too when I read the "dev" mailing list >> archives. The 3.2.x branch seems to be broken. > > True on both counts. Though a more revealing and accurate description is > probably; most the committers are busy with their day jobs and the small > number of active people are stretched pretty thin. I know I'm getting about > 4hrs of sleep a night.
shame man, yeah that was about as much as I got lastnight too. I do understand and don't blame anyone, but I also don't really know where to start helping to get 3.2 out. > I pushed some binaries as well: thx! will try now.. -- <>< Marius ><>
