i'm quite again using JMS for local asynchronism generally not the goal of JMS IMO
Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2012/12/16 Anthony Fryer <apfr...@hotmail.com>: > Another change you could make to improve the performance of the method > invoked by the timer, is instead of performing the actual database insert > for each email in that method, instead write a message to a JMS queue. Then > create a message driven bean that processes the JMS messages and performs > the actual database insert. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Re-Why-are-Tomcat-s-threads-more-costly-than-background-threads-tp4659429p4659697.html > Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
