Almost forgot...PrimeFaces peer/friend of mine informed me that JMS is good for running two instances of an app, similar to load balancer.
Prior to using TomEE, I really wanted to use PrimeFaces Push (powered by Atmosphere/websocket), and at that time, I was thinking that I could possibly run Tomcat or TomEE just to push messages to the clients of my app running on Glassfish, since Glassfish had issues with PrimeFaces Push (Atmosphere). I think he said that tomEE and Glassfish could do that, but they would have to communicate via JMS or the two servlets would have to serve requests/responses, appropriately, via JMS. I am probably not stating the above correctly as he said, but that's how I understood what he told me. Now that I'm only using tomEE, there is no need to do such a thing. Loving TomEE!!! On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. < smithh032...@gmail.com> wrote: > Very interesting discussion and responses here! Anthony motivates me to > jump on the bandwagon of using JMS/message-driven-beans, and at the same > time, Romain tells me, not much need (for local) in a Java EE 6 > application. :) > > Either way, i have not ruled out JMS. I have done some strategic coding on > my part to avoid @Schedule or use of timer service...using Date class to > postpone pushing data to google calendar, and only pushing when there is a > new date to update...application-wide. At first, i was pushing data to > google calendar after 'every' update request... sending over 1,000 requests > to google calendar sometimes or daily (adding and deleting events on google > calendar to keep google calendar in sync with the database), but I cut that > back (or decreased the # of requests) with the new code I developed 2+ > months ago. just makes for a faster user experience since they requested to > have data updated via ajax on change/selection of this field, and that > field. > > Right now, JMS would be similar to a nice science project for me... just > to see if I can do it and the success of it. > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> I used it a lot in javaee 5 (openejb 3) but i'm happy to leave it on the >> road qince javaee 6, no more. >> >> It works but i dont find it effective when it stays local >> > >
