On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:11:48 -0400 Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > But it's also clear that OpenJPA 2.0 will require Java 6. So I have > > no issues with making the switch for 2.0. > > Agree. I'd like us to require Java SE 6 for build and runtime. Agree. > > > > > But is it a problem staying with Java 5 for the 1.x lines? > > No, I'd expect us to stay with the Java SE 5 binary compatible > requirement for 1.0.x - 1.3.x, but allow 1.2.x and 1.3.x to be tested > and used on Java SE 6. Agree again it is important that 1.x can use both Java 5 and Java 6 as that is what a lot of people use including web applications. -- Best Regards David Beer http://www.thebeerfamily.com
